Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Distinguishing between patient's refusals and requests

B Gert1, J L Bernat, R P Mogielnicki

  • 1Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.

The Hastings Center Report
|July 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Permanent brain arrest as the sole criterion of death in systemic circulatory arrest.

Anaesthesia·2020
Same author

Ethical Issues in the Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Controlled Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2016
Same author

To tell or not to tell? Revealing the diagnosis in multiple sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders·2015
Same author

Estimating risks of de novo kidney diseases after living kidney donation.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2014
Same author

American Academy of Neurology policy on pharmaceutical and device industry support.

Neurology·2012
Same author

Report of a National Conference on Donation after cardiac death.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2006
Same journal

Harm Reduction as an Alternative to Mandated Drug Treatment.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment: Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Making the Move to a Learning System of Research Ethics.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Musical Performance and Biomedical Human Enhancement: Ethnographic Perspectives on Bioethical Questions.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene-Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

The Hastings Center report·2026
See all related articles

Understanding patient choices in medical treatment is vital. Distinguishing between treatment requests and refusals is crucial, especially concerning end-of-life decisions like killing or letting die.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Patient Autonomy

Background:

  • The concept of patient choice in healthcare is complex.
  • Existing discourse often conflates distinct patient actions regarding treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the critical distinction between requesting and refusing medical treatment.
  • To analyze the ethical implications of this distinction in end-of-life care.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of patient autonomy and decision-making.
  • Ethical examination of treatment requests versus refusals.

Main Results:

  • The term 'patient choice' can obscure the difference between active requests and passive refusals of treatment.
Keywords:
American Medical AssociationDeath and EuthanasiaProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • This distinction is paramount when discussing actions that result in death, such as killing or letting die.

    • Conclusions:

    • A precise differentiation between treatment requests and refusals is ethically necessary.
    • Clearer terminology is required for nuanced discussions on end-of-life medical decisions.