Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Portable software tools for 3D radiation therapy planning

J Jacky1, I Kalet, J Chen

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology RC-08, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
|November 15, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biomdecial and Health Informatics Research and Education at the University of Washington.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2016
Same author

Reply to comment on: 'Predicting the efficacy of radiotherapy in individual glioblastoma patients in vivo: a mathematical modeling approach'.

Physics in medicine and biology·2016
Same author

Predicting the efficacy of radiotherapy in individual glioblastoma patients in vivo: a mathematical modeling approach.

Physics in medicine and biology·2010
Same author

A 'learning-by-doing' treatment planning tutorial for medical physicists.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2009
Same author

Automated planning target volume generation: an evaluation pitting a computer-based tool against human experts.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·1997
Same author

Consistency of three-dimensional planning target volumes across physicians and institutions.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·1997
Same journal

Single Percussive Ventilation Breath-hold Imaging and Delivery in Lung Tumor Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: Initial Observations From a Prospective Clinical Trial.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Proton beam therapy in nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: Outcome, prognostic factors and the effect of timing of radiation therapy.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Hypofractionated Proton Reirradiation for Recurrent Glioblastoma: Clinical and Dosimetric Outcomes from a Large Single Institution Series.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Gastrointestinal Motility-Induced Interplay in Pancreas Proton Therapy: Motion Simulation and Dosimetric Impact.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Intra-fractional Voxel-wise Anatomical Motion Tracking Guided by Multimodal Respiratory Surrogates in Radiotherapy: Framework Development and Multi-Center Validation.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

A Gaussian-based planning approach for robust dose-escalated stereotactic body proton therapy.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
See all related articles

Portable software tools for three-dimensional (3D) radiation therapy planning were developed and successfully tested across multiple institutions. These tools enhance radiotherapy planning by being adaptable to various 3D systems through a standardized interface called the Foundation.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiotherapy Technology
  • Software Engineering

Background:

  • Three-dimensional (3D) radiation therapy planning systems are crucial for precise cancer treatment.
  • Interoperability between different 3D planning systems and specialized software tools remains a challenge.
  • The development of standardized interfaces is essential for enhancing the utility of radiotherapy software.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To create a suite of portable software tools supporting 3D radiation therapy planning.
  • To ensure these tools are compatible with existing 3D planning systems through a common interface, the Foundation.
  • To facilitate tasks such as image-based data derivation, target volume contouring, plan evaluation, and treatment delivery verification.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Software tools were developed collaboratively across three geographically dispersed institutions.
  • A standardized programming interface, the Foundation, was specified by developers from all participating sites.
  • Each institution implemented a site-specific Foundation to interface with their unique 3D planning system, ensuring tool portability.

    • Main Results:

    • All developed software tools operated successfully without modification across all three institutions.
    • The implementation of the Foundation for each 3D planning system required minimal programming effort (a few person-months).
    • The source code and documentation for the tools have been made publicly available in the public domain.

    Conclusions:

    • Developing portable radiotherapy treatment planning tools is both practical and cost-effective.
    • 3D planning system providers are encouraged to implement the Foundation interface to enable compatibility with external tools.
    • Researchers developing new software for radiotherapy should design them as portable tools to maximize their applicability across different 3D planning systems.