Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

13:00
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
Effect of sequence delay on the discrimination of temporal patterns
R D Sorkin1, D A Montgomery, T Sadralodabai
1Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|October 1, 1994
Summary
Listeners struggle to distinguish temporal patterns when sequences overlap in time. This suggests a limitation in processing multiple auditory patterns simultaneously, impacting auditory perception research.
Area of Science:
- Auditory Perception
- Psychoacoustics
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Listeners discriminate temporal patterns based on time intervals between tones.
- The temporal pattern correlation model posits information extraction and correlation computation.
- Auditory processing limitations may affect pattern discrimination accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate listeners' ability to discriminate between two temporal patterns.
- To examine the effect of time interval and sequence overlap on discrimination performance.
- To test the hypothesis that a discrimination mechanism cannot process multiple patterns concurrently.
Main Methods:
- Participants discriminated between two arrhythmic tone sequences (nine tones each).
- Temporal patterns were defined by inter-tone time intervals.
- A key manipulation involved varying the overlap in time between the two sequences.
- Tones in the second sequence were presented at a different frequency than the first.
Main Results:
- Discrimination performance was high when sequences did not overlap in time.
- Performance significantly decreased when the temporal patterns overlapped.
- Results were consistent with a single-pattern processing limitation.
Conclusions:
- Listeners' ability to discriminate temporal patterns is impaired by sequence overlap.
- Auditory processing appears limited to handling one temporal pattern at a time.
- Findings inform models of auditory perception and attention.
Related Concept Videos
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Basic Discrete Time Signals
The unit step sequence is defined as 1 for zero and positive values of the integer n. This sequence can be graphically displayed using a set of eight sample points, showing a step function starting from n=0 and remaining constant thereafter.
The unit impulse or sample sequence is mathematically expressed as zero for all n values except at n=0, where it is one. The unit impulse sequence, denoted by δ(n), is the first difference of the unit step sequence, while the unit step sequence u(n) is the...
The unit impulse or sample sequence is mathematically expressed as zero for all n values except at n=0, where it is one. The unit impulse sequence, denoted by δ(n), is the first difference of the unit step sequence, while the unit step sequence u(n) is the...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

