Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How libido theory shaped technique (1911-1915)

J D Lichtenberg1

  • 1Georgetown University, Faculty, Washington Psychoanalytic Institute.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Sigmund Freud

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Listening, understanding and interpreting: reflections on complexity.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·1999
Same author

Experience as a guide to psychoanalytic theory and practice.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·1998
Same author

General principles of self psychology: a position statement.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·1997
Same author

[Values and moral attitudes].

Psyche·1996
Same author

A motivational systems approach to the clinical experience.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·1994
Same author

The empathic mode of perception: an update.

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis·1993

Area of Science:

  • Psychoanalytic theory and practice.
  • Psychodynamic principles and therapeutic techniques.

Background:

  • Examines Sigmund Freud's seminal papers on psychoanalytic technique.
  • Highlights Freud's confidence in his libido theory versus skepticism towards contemporary analysts' practices.
  • Notes the prescriptive nature of Freud's papers, emphasizing prohibitions over recommendations.

Discussion:

  • Analyzes Freud's papers on technique as a reflection of psychoanalysis during its early development.
  • Contrasts the "age of innocence" depicted in Freud's writings with contemporary psychoanalytic complexities.
  • Discusses the evolution of understanding the analyst-analysand relationship over time.

Key Insights:

  • Freud's technique papers reveal a foundational, yet evolving, understanding of psychoanalysis.
  • The papers underscore a historical shift from early psychoanalytic ideals to modern therapeutic intricacies.
  • A critical perspective on historical psychoanalytic methods and their divergence from current practices.

Outlook:

  • Suggests a need to contextualize historical psychoanalytic techniques within their original framework.
  • Implies that understanding this transitional phase is crucial for appreciating the development of psychoanalytic thought.
  • Encourages further exploration into the historical evolution of the therapeutic dyad in psychoanalysis.

Related Experiment Videos