Related Experiment Videos
Evaluation of medical audit
1Division of Public Health, Nuffield Institute for Health, Leeds.
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
|October 1, 1994
Summary
Medical audit programmes show limited effectiveness in changing clinical behavior. Impact varies greatly by local factors, necessitating more qualitative research for generalizable strategies.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Management
- Clinical Quality Improvement
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Medical audit is a key tool for quality assurance in healthcare.
- Evaluating the overall effectiveness of medical audit programs is challenging.
- Most studies focus on specific interventions rather than comprehensive programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review existing knowledge on the effectiveness of medical audit programs.
- To assess specific interventions used within medical audits to change clinical behavior.
- To identify factors influencing the success of medical audit initiatives.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review of Medline-indexed articles (1985-1992).
- Inclusion of articles on "quality assurance" or "medical audit" and "evaluation".
- Exclusion of simple descriptions, replications, and non-English publications.
Main Results:
- Few evaluations assess entire medical audit programs; most focus on specific interventions.
- Interventions target patient characteristics, physician characteristics, organizational structures, or financial incentives.
- The scientific and technical aspects of quality are often the primary focus.
Conclusions:
- Current understanding of effective clinical behavior change methods via audit is limited.
- The impact of medical audits is highly context-dependent, hindering generalizability.
- Further qualitative research is needed to understand local factors influencing audit outcomes.