Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A reevaluation of semantic versus nonsemantic processing in implicit memory

A S Brown1, D B Mitchell

  • 1Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275.

Memory & Cognition
|September 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction to: Elevated maternal C-reactive protein and autism in a national birth cohort.

Molecular psychiatry·2025
Same author

Patient-centred outcomes.

BJA education·2025
Same author

Infectious and immunogenetic factors in bipolar disorder.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2017
Same author

Insights into the effects of metal nanostructuring and oxidation on the work function and charge transfer of metal/graphene hybrids.

Nanoscale·2015
Same author

Development of on-line FTIR spectroscopy for siloxane detection in biogas to enhance carbon contactor management.

Talanta·2015
Same author

Relationship dimensions of the 'Down syndrome advantage'.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2014
Same journal

The properties of personal semantics.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Music enhances associative generalization: Evidence from a memory integration task.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Video, text, and memory: An emotional verbal overshadowing effect.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Semantic processing typically shows a memory advantage on implicit tests, contrary to some prior research. A meta-analysis of 38 studies confirmed this finding, indicating implicit memory tests capture both conceptual and perceptual processes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Previous research yielded mixed results on whether semantic processing offers a memorial advantage over nonsemantic processing in implicit memory tests.
  • Explicit memory tests typically show a clear advantage for semantic over nonsemantic processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze studies examining processing effects on implicit memory tests.
  • To determine if semantic processing consistently leads to greater priming than nonsemantic processing on implicit measures.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search identified 38 relevant studies comprising 166 outcomes.
  • Studies involved manipulation of processing (semantic vs. nonsemantic) on various implicit memory tests.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data were analyzed across different types of implicit tests (perceptual, conceptual) and experimental designs (within-subjects, between-subjects).

    • Main Results:

    • Across 166 outcomes, 131 (79%) demonstrated greater priming following semantic processing compared to nonsemantic processing.
    • This semantic advantage was observed in both perceptual and conceptual implicit memory tests.
    • The effect persisted across different experimental designs, strengthening its reliability.

    Conclusions:

    • Implicit memory tests appear sensitive to both conceptual and perceptual processing.
    • The consistent finding of a semantic processing advantage on implicit tests challenges prior conclusions suggesting no such effect.
    • While explicit contamination might play a minor role, it cannot fully explain the widespread semantic advantage, particularly in perceptual implicit tests.