Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How and why do the two cerebral hemispheres interact?

M J Hoptman1, R J Davidson

  • 1University of Wisconsin, Department of Psychology, Madison 53706.

Psychological Bulletin
|September 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and validation of single-item experience sampling measures of wellbeing in teens.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Incidental Findings from 16,400 Brain MRI Examinations of Research Volunteers.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2023
Same author

Differential DNA methylation in experienced meditators after an intensive day of mindfulness-based practice: Implications for immune-related pathways.

Brain, behavior, and immunity·2019
Same author

Differential effects of non-dual and focused attention meditations on the formation of automatic perceptual habits in expert practitioners.

Neuropsychologia·2018
Same author

Correction to: Investigation of brain structure in the 1-month infant.

Brain structure & function·2018
Same author

Investigation of brain structure in the 1-month infant.

Brain structure & function·2018
Same journal

Does the variance of personality traits change across the lifespan? A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence as a partner in meta-analysis-Research agenda, user recommendations, and speed-accuracy tradeoffs: Commentary on Jansen et al. (2025).

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Relationships between cognition and daily functioning in adults with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

The association between reading anxiety and reading achievement: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Perfectionism is accelerating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analytic review of 35 years of college student data.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

High math anxiety is associated with lower math achievement across 90 countries: An individual participant data meta-analysis of representative student and adult samples.

Psychological bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Individual differences in corpus callosum (CC) anatomy impact interhemispheric interaction and transfer times. Beneficial interaction occurs when both hemispheres are competent in difficult tasks, potentially aiding attention distribution.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Anatomy

Background:

  • Interhemispheric interaction is crucial for cognitive functions.
  • The corpus callosum (CC) is the primary white matter tract connecting the brain's hemispheres.
  • Individual variations in CC anatomy may influence cognitive processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the anatomical underpinnings of interhemispheric interaction.
  • To explore the relationship between corpus callosum anatomy and interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT).
  • To discuss conditions favoring beneficial interhemispheric collaboration.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on corpus callosum anatomy and function.
  • Analysis of research on interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT) and its asymmetries.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Synthesis of findings regarding task difficulty and hemispheric competence.

    • Main Results:

    • Corpus callosum (CC) anatomy varies individually, affecting interhemispheric interaction.
    • Interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT) exhibits variations and potential asymmetries.
    • Pathological changes in IHTT may correlate with cognitive deficits.
    • Interhemispheric interaction proves beneficial when both hemispheres possess competence for challenging tasks.

    Conclusions:

    • Corpus callosum (CC) structure is fundamental to efficient interhemispheric communication.
    • Understanding individual differences in CC anatomy and IHTT is vital for cognitive neuroscience.
    • The CC's role in attention distribution may explain benefits of interhemispheric collaboration in complex tasks.