Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory

H Pashler1

  • 1Department of Psychology 0109, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla 92093.

Psychological Bulletin
|September 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Divided attention: Storing and classifying briefly presented objects.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury's hypothesis.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: dominant role of uniqueness.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses.

Consciousness and cognition·2001
Same author

Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent?

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same author

Perception and production of brief durations: beat-based versus interval-based timing.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same journal

Artificial intelligence as a partner in meta-analysis-Research agenda, user recommendations, and speed-accuracy tradeoffs: Commentary on Jansen et al. (2025).

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Relationships between cognition and daily functioning in adults with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

The association between reading anxiety and reading achievement: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Perfectionism is accelerating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analytic review of 35 years of college student data.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

High math anxiety is associated with lower math achievement across 90 countries: An individual participant data meta-analysis of representative student and adult samples.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Is thinking inherently unpleasant? A cautionary note on David, Vassena, and Bijleveld (2024).

Psychological bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Performing two tasks at once is difficult due to a cognitive bottleneck. This bottleneck affects action selection and memory retrieval, challenging current attentional resource theories.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Concurrent task performance frequently leads to interference, a phenomenon studied for decades.
  • The exact nature of attentional limitations and their causes remain a subject of debate.
  • Existing theories on attentional resources struggle to fully explain dual-task interference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the underlying mechanisms of interference during dual-task performance.
  • To clarify the nature and extent of attentional limitations.
  • To challenge and refine existing models of attention and cognitive processing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing the psychological refractory period (PRP) effect paradigm.
  • Analyzing reaction time data to identify processing bottlenecks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Designing experiments to isolate different sources of task interference.

    • Main Results:

    • Evidence points to a persistent bottleneck in action selection and memory retrieval.
    • Distinct interference sources identified in task preparation, sensory-perceptual processing, and timing.
    • Findings challenge the notion of a single, flexible attentional resource.

    Conclusions:

    • Dual-task interference arises from multiple, specific limitations, not just general resource depletion.
    • The psychological refractory period effect highlights a critical bottleneck in cognitive processing.
    • Results necessitate a revised understanding of attentional capacity and dual-task performance.