Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Solarization in clinical imaging

M M Goodsitt1, T W Hepburn, P N Cascade

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor 48109-0030.

Radiology
|December 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Standardization in Quantitative Imaging: A Multicenter Comparison of Radiomic Features from Different Software Packages on Digital Reference Objects and Patient Data Sets.

Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)·2020
Same author

Drivers, challenges and opportunities of forage technology adoption by smallholder cattle households in Cambodia.

Tropical animal health and production·2017
Same author

It's all in the hands: peripheral stigmata of infective endocarditis.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2014
Same author

Polymer planar waveguide device using inverted channel structure with upper liquid crystal cladding.

Optics express·2009
Same author

Chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis in monozygotic twins.

Clinical and experimental dermatology·2009
Same author

Skin decontamination of glyphosate from human skin in vitro.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2008
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

A new screen-film system exhibits solarization at lower X-ray exposure levels than its predecessor. This contrast reversal can obscure details, potentially impacting diagnostic accuracy in radiography.

Area of Science:

  • Radiologic Technology
  • Medical Imaging Physics

Background:

  • Screen-film systems are crucial in medical imaging.
  • Solarization, a phenomenon in film radiography, can degrade image quality.
  • Understanding solarization thresholds is vital for maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the X-ray exposure levels at which solarization occurs in a new screen-film system.
  • To compare the solarization threshold of the new system with its predecessor.
  • To assess the potential impact of solarization on radiographic diagnostic accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of two screen-film systems (new vs. predecessor) from the same manufacturer, both speed class 400.
  • Determination of solarization occurrence by evaluating contrast reversal at specific cassette exposure levels (measured in mR and C/kg).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Solarization was evident in the new screen-film system at 132 mR (3.4 x 10(-5) C/kg).
  • The predecessor system did not exhibit solarization even at five times the exposure level of the new system.
  • Solarization can obscure bone and soft-tissue details, negatively affecting diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The new screen-film system demonstrates a significantly lower threshold for solarization compared to the older system.
  • Radiographers should be aware of the increased susceptibility to solarization with the new system.
  • Careful control of X-ray exposure is necessary to prevent solarization and maintain diagnostic quality.