Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Rehabilitation relevant diagnostic procedures]

J Greve1

  • 1Krankenversicherung in Hessen, Marburg.

Die Rehabilitation
|August 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluates four rehabilitation diagnostic instruments, including the EAM system and IRES questionnaire, against the WHO

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Outcome of the geriatric head and neck cancer patient].

HNO·2026
Same author

Exoscopic-assisted head and neck surgery: a comparative evaluation optimizing ergonomics and workflow.

Journal of robotic surgery·2025
Same author

[Typical emergencies in otorhinolaryngology-a monocentric analysis of the seasonal course].

HNO·2022
Same author

[Oncologic follow-up in head and neck cancer patients].

HNO·2022
Same author

Performance of microvascular anastomosis with a new robotic visualization system: proof of concept.

Journal of robotic surgery·2021
Same author

[Robotics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery].

HNO·2021

Area of Science:

  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Health Services Research

Context:

  • The World Health Organization's International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps (ICIDH) provides a framework for assessing health conditions.
  • German-language literature has limited commentary on the ICIDH and its application in rehabilitation.
  • Current rehabilitation diagnostics require standardized and systemic appraisal methods.

Purpose:

  • To investigate the usefulness, merit, and specific approaches of four current rehabilitation diagnostic instruments.
  • To assess the alignment of these instruments with the ICIDH framework.
  • To identify needs for differentiated and systemic appraisal in rehabilitation.

Summary:

  • Four instruments—EAM system, IRES questionnaire, and RPK procedure—were evaluated for their diagnostic utility in rehabilitation.
  • The EAM system focuses on occupationally integrative, job-specific appraisal with standardized analysis.
  • The IRES questionnaire offers subjective criteria but lacks objective severity appraisal, while the RPK procedure evaluates rehabilitation for chronic mental illness.

Impact:

  • Each instrument possesses distinct value, but a comprehensive understanding of disease consequences across different experience levels is crucial.
  • Differentiated, systemic appraisal and ongoing rehabilitation-specific consideration are necessary for effective rehabilitation and integration prognosis.
  • The findings highlight the need for a holistic approach to rehabilitation diagnostics and planning.

Related Experiment Videos