[Bone remodeling after reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing. A histomorphometric study]

Experimental findings after unreamed nailing have indicated certain advantages for new bone formation in comparison to reamed nailing. It would be of interest to establish whether any essential differences can be determined in the extent and course of callus formation. To investigate this question, thin sections of bone from 16 tibiae (nailing after transverse osteotomy in sheep) were examined histomorphometrically the progress at the periosteal and interfragmentary surfaces of the remodelling callus being recorded separately after 4, 6 and 8 weeks. After unreamed nailing, more extensive and earlier formation of interfragmentary callus was observed. At 4 weeks postoperatively the remodelled periosteal bone surface was 158 mm2, which was 1.6 times that after the unreamed procedure (95 mm2). By 4 weeks after unreamed nailing the periosteal callus surface was already greater than 6 weeks after reamed nailing. On the basis of these experimental results the use of unreamed nailing can be recommended, especially for open fractures and fractures with severe soft tissue damage.