Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guinea-pig contact sensitization assays

T Maurer1, A Arthur, P Bentley

  • 1Ciba-Geigy Ltd., Pharmaceuticals Division, Preclinical Safety PH 2.812, Basel, Switzerland.

Toxicology
|September 22, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of peritoneal bladder flap in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients on lymphoceles: a prospective randomised trial.

World journal of urology·2025
Same author

[Metachronous oligometastatic prostate cancer-the more the better or only local treatment?]

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2021
Same author

Tired of feeling tired - The role of circulating inflammatory biomarkers and long-term cancer related fatigue in breast cancer survivors.

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2021
Same author

Identifying gaps in global health dermatology: a survey of GLODERM members.

The British journal of dermatology·2021
Same author

[Tumor biology of metastatic prostate cancer: clinical implications].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2021
Same author

Considerations for Antiplatelet Management of Carotid Stenting in the Setting of Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Delphi Consensus Statement.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2020

This study reviews predictive animal skin sensitization tests, focusing on OECD and EC guidelines, induction concentration, and vehicle choice. It highlights the importance of in-house validation for accurate chemical sensitizing potential prediction.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Dermatology
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • Overview of predictive animal skin sensitization tests.
  • Historical development and recent changes (last 2 years) in testing guidelines.
  • Established factors influencing contact allergy induction and challenge in animals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Discuss recommended Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and European Commission (EC) tests.
  • Analyze key factors like induction concentration and vehicle choice.
  • Compare screening strategies between Europe and the USA.

Main Methods:

  • Review of general aspects and historical development of predictive animal skin sensitization tests.
  • Discussion of recommended OECD and EC tests.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Focus on induction concentration and vehicle selection in animal models.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified key factors influencing animal models for skin sensitization.
    • Presented differences in screening strategies between Europe and the USA.
    • Emphasized the significance of in-house validation for predictive accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • In-house validation is crucial for reliable prediction of chemical sensitizing potential.
    • Discusses the role and importance of predictive in vitro tests.
    • Highlights the need for careful consideration of induction concentration and vehicle in animal testing.