Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Implants and transplants in bone replacement]

G O Hofmann1

  • 1Chirurgischen Klinik und Poliklinik, Universität München, Klinikum Grosshadern.

Versicherungsmedizin
|October 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond the Field of View: Enhancing Detection of Orthopaedic Metastases in Cancer Staging.

Acta orthopaedica Belgica·2026
Same author

[Reconstruction of a metadiaphyseal bone defect after open comminuted fracture of the proximal femur using a modified Masquelet technique].

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2023
Same author

The role of the posterior malleolus in the treatment of unstable upper ankle joint injuries - A biomechanical study.

Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons·2022
Same author

Open versus minimally invasive fixation of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal diseases.

European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society·2021
Same author

[Closed reduction and minimally invasive fixation of a sacral avulsion fracture : Minimal invasiveness with maximum stability].

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2021
Same author

[Extensor tendon injuries of the thumb].

Der Unfallchirurg·2021
Same journal

[What do company health insurance plans provide?]

Versicherungsmedizin·2017
Same journal

[Assessment of prescriptive therapies and remedies - Experience and results].

Versicherungsmedizin·2017
Same journal

[The importance of biosimilars medicines for private and statutory health insurance].

Versicherungsmedizin·2017
Same journal

[Can we transfer the mechanisms of the generics market to biosimilars?]

Versicherungsmedizin·2017
Same journal

[Not Available].

Versicherungsmedizin·2016
Same journal

[Not Available].

Versicherungsmedizin·2016
See all related articles

Orthopaedic surgery uses implants and grafts for bone defects and joint restoration. Material choice depends on patient-specific factors, with future research exploring biological joint replacement.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Implants and grafts are crucial in orthopaedic surgery for addressing osseous defects and joint reconstruction.
  • Bone substitute materials originate from diverse biological and technical sources, each with unique properties.
  • Evaluating the pros and cons of various bone and joint substitution methods is essential for clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of different bone and joint substitution methods.
  • To compare the advantages and disadvantages of various orthopaedic implants and grafts.
  • To discuss future directions in bone and joint grafting, including biological approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and analysis of existing studies on bone and joint substitution techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative assessment of biological (e.g., allografts) and technical (e.g., synthetic implants) materials.
  • Discussion of clinical, economic, and social factors influencing treatment selection.

    • Main Results:

    • Various bone substitute materials offer different benefits and drawbacks for osseous defects and joint restoration.
    • The optimal choice of implant or graft is contingent upon individual patient circumstances, including medical, economic, and social considerations.
    • Allogeneic bone and joint grafting presents promising avenues for future biological joint replacement strategies.

    Conclusions:

    • The selection of bone and joint substitution materials requires a holistic approach, considering patient-specific factors.
    • Continued research into allogeneic grafting holds potential for advancing biological joint replacement techniques.
    • A balanced consideration of current methods and future innovations is vital for improving orthopaedic patient outcomes.