Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Axillary approach for gynecomastia liposuction

A C Abramo

    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
    |January 1, 1994
    PubMed
    Summary

    Axillary liposuction effectively treats male breast conditions like pseudogynecomastia and gynecomastia. This technique offers improved contouring and avoids complications associated with traditional surgical methods.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The "lazy S-shaped" plication of the SMAS-platysma musculoaponeurotic system: a 10-year review.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·2001
    Same author

    Late spontaneous extrusion of a texturized silicone gel mammary implant.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·2000
    Same author

    H-Shaped, double-contour plication in abdominoplasty.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·1999
    Same author

    Extramucosal rhinoplasty with videoscopic assistance.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·1998
    Same author

    Abdominoplasty with two fusiform plications.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·1996
    Same author

    Full facelift through an endoscopic approach.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·1996

    Area of Science:

    • Plastic Surgery
    • Aesthetic Medicine
    • Surgical Techniques

    Background:

    • Gynecomastia and pseudogynecomastia are common conditions affecting male breast appearance.
    • Traditional surgical approaches can result in significant complications and suboptimal aesthetic outcomes.
    • Minimally invasive techniques are sought to improve patient results and recovery.