Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Debonding forces applied to ceramic brackets simulating clinical conditions

S E Bishara1, J M Forrseca, D E Fehr

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.

The Angle Orthodontist
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dynamic viscoelastic behavior of resin cements measured by torsional resonance.

Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials·2003
Same author

Effects of oral habits' duration on dental characteristics in the primary dentition.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2002
Same author

Evaluation of nonrinse conditioning solution and a compomer as an alternative method of bonding orthodontic bracket.

The Angle orthodontist·2002
Same author

Effect of using a new cyanoacrylate adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

The Angle orthodontist·2002
Same author

Effect of polyaramid fiber reinforcement on the strength of 3 denture base polymethyl methacrylate resins.

Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists·2001
Same author

Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations.

Operative dentistry·2001
Same journal

Impact of cone-beam computed tomography image quality on artificial intelligence-driven three-dimensional tooth segmentation and evaluation of external apical root resorption.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Bracket transfer accuracy of two three-dimensionally printed lingual indirect bonding trays with different bracket frame designs.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Biomechanical impact of beveling design on extrusion of a maxillary canine and a maxillary first molar: an in vitro and finite element analysis study.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of resin-modified glass ionomer vs composite bonding agents for orthodontic bonding: a single-center randomized controlled trial.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Plastic deformation evaluation of clear aligners exposed to different cleaning solutions.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Quantitative evaluation of an artificial intelligence-driven remote monitoring system for occlusion assessment using patient-captured images.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
See all related articles

Debonding ceramic brackets using clinical pliers requires 30% less force than laboratory shear testing. This finding is crucial for minimizing enamel damage during orthodontic treatment, ensuring patient safety.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Dental Mechanics

Background:

  • Ceramic bracket debonding is a clinical concern due to potential enamel damage.
  • Previous studies have focused on laboratory testing, raising questions about clinical relevance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the forces used in clinical ceramic bracket removal with those from laboratory shear testing.
  • To evaluate the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scores for both debonding methods.

Main Methods:

  • Clinical bracket removal forces were measured.
  • Laboratory shear forces were applied.
  • Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scores were analyzed and compared between groups.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Mean bond strength for shear forces was 107.8 kg/cm².
  • Mean bond strength for modified diametral compression was 67.8 kg/cm².
  • Clinical pliers required 30% less force than laboratory shear testing, with no significant difference in ARI scores.

    • Conclusions:

    • Clinical debonding of ceramic brackets with pliers generates significantly lower forces than laboratory shear testing.
    • The method of debonding did not significantly affect the location of bond failure (ARI scores).
    • This suggests a potentially safer clinical approach for ceramic bracket removal, reducing enamel fracture risk.