Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026
Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
A prospective comparison of paramedic judgment and the trauma triage rule in the prehospital setting
G R Fries1, G McCalla, M A Levitt
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland General Hospital, University of California at San Francisco, Oakland.
Study Objective:
To study paramedic judgment and the Trauma Triage Rule in prehospital trauma triage.
Design:
Prospective.
Setting:
A county emergency medical services system.
Participants:
Six hundred fifty-three trauma patients.
Results:
Over a 3-month period, 653 trauma patients were evaluated in the prehospital setting. Paramedic judgment and the Trauma Triage Rule (TTR), as described by Baxt, were evaluated for accuracy in identifying patients requiring trauma center care. The TTR achieved a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 86%. Paramedic judgment had a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 60%. Combining the TTR and paramedic judgment achieved a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 75%.
Conclusion:
The TTR and paramedic judgment are effective in identifying patients who require trauma center care in the prehospital setting. The TTR and paramedic judgment combined have the greatest predictive value in identifying seriously injured patients.
Related Concept Videos
01:10Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
01:23Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use