Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improved mammographic imaging using tissue expanders for breast augmentation

W E Matory1, C D'Orsi, L Moss

  • 1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01655.

Annals of Plastic Surgery
|August 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

The study examined whether tissue expanders could improve mammographic imaging in patients who have undergone breast augmentation. Researchers compared imaging outcomes when implants were inflated versus deflated. They found that deflated tissue expanders provided clearer visualization of breast tissue, especially in patients with small breast volume, tight skin envelopes, or capsular contracture. Inflated implants impaired imaging through opacity and exposure control issues. Deflation improved radiographic interpretation in these challenging cases. The findings suggest that tissue expanders may be a useful option for augmentation mammoplasty in patients where imaging is difficult.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decoding the baboon's expressive capacity: facial microanatomy and the development of a PapioFACS.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Long-term mortality of patients admitted to an intensive care unit with seizures: a population-based study.

Anaesthesia·2020
Same author

Differentiated Thyroid Cancer in Children: A UK Multicentre Review and Review of the Literature.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2019
Same author

Isolation and characterization of Enterobacteriaceae species infesting post-harvest strawberries and their biological control using bacteriophages.

Applied microbiology and biotechnology·2016
Same author

Integrin signalling regulates the expansion of neuroepithelial progenitors and neurogenesis via Wnt7a and Decorin.

Nature communications·2016
Same author

A comparison of clinical practice guidelines for proximal femoral fracture.

Anaesthesia·2012

Area of Science:

  • Breast surgery outcomes research within plastic surgery
  • Mammographic imaging techniques in diagnostic radiology
  • Breast augmentation device development in biomedical engineering

Background:

Mammographic imaging of augmented breasts is limited by implant-related factors. Prior research has shown that both submammary and submuscular implants hinder diagnostic accuracy. The challenge arises from implant opacity and interference with mammographic compression. These effects are not confined to a single implant type or composition. Small breasts and tight skin envelopes pose additional difficulties for imaging. Capsular contracture further complicates visualization of glandular tissue. Standard displacement techniques fail in certain clinical scenarios. This gap motivated a study to evaluate tissue expanders as an alternative. The uncertainty around optimal implant types for imaging led to this investigation.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to assess whether tissue expanders could improve mammographic imaging in augmented breasts. Researchers focused on patients with small breast volume or tight skin envelopes. The specific problem addressed was inadequate glandular tissue visualization with standard techniques. The motivation stemmed from clinical challenges in diagnosing augmented breasts. The study sought to compare imaging outcomes with and without implant deflation. Radiographic techniques were evaluated for their effectiveness. The goal was to determine if deflated expanders provided clearer imaging. This approach aimed to address limitations of current implant types.

Keywords:
breast imaging techniquestissue expander useaugmentation mammoplastymammogram accuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Deflated tissue expanders reduce implant opacity and exposure control issues, improving glandular tissue visualization.

Implant opacity, impaired exposure control, and interference with breast compressibility limit imaging accuracy.

Deflation optimizes radiographic interpretation in cases of grade III or IV contracture, where compression is compromised.

Tissue expanders were evaluated as a potential alternative to standard implants for improved mammographic imaging.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The study involved 25 combination gel/saline and 25 saline-filled tissue expanders placed subpectorally. Radiographs were taken using standard and displacement techniques within 3 months post-surgery. Patients with inflated implants underwent repeat displacement studies after deflation. Mammograms were analyzed for visualization quality in different scenarios. Breast compression and exposure control were assessed as part of the evaluation. The study tracked outcomes in patients with small breast volume or capsular contracture. Radiographic interpretation was compared between inflated and deflated states. The primary outcome was the clarity of glandular tissue visualization.

Main Results:

Deflated tissue expanders provided better visualization of breast tissue in small breasts or tight skin envelopes. Inflated implants impaired imaging through opacity and exposure control issues. Deflation improved radiographic interpretation in cases of capsular contracture. Patients with grade III or IV contracture showed greater improvement with deflated implants. Mammographic compression was compromised more severely in advanced contracture cases. The displaced view failed to adequately show glandular tissue in these scenarios. Deflatable implants reduced obscuration of the augmented breast. These findings suggest a potential benefit of using tissue expanders for imaging.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that deflated tissue expanders may enhance mammographic imaging in augmented breasts. This approach may be particularly useful in patients with small breast volume or tight skin envelopes. The study suggests that implant deflation optimizes radiographic interpretation. Inflated implants consistently impaired visualization through multiple mechanisms. The displaced view was insufficient in cases of capsular contracture. Deflation improved imaging clarity in these challenging scenarios. The authors suggest considering tissue expanders as an option for augmentation mammoplasty. These findings align with the study's aim to improve diagnostic accuracy in augmented breasts.

Inflated implants compromised compressibility more in patients with tight skin envelopes or contracture.

The study proposes considering extended-use deflatable devices for patients with small breasts or contracture risk.