Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Provider perceptions in using outcomes data to improve clinical practice

A L Shroyer1, I Dauber, R H Jones

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
|December 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inhibition of DNA2 nuclease as a therapeutic strategy targeting replication stress in cancer cells.

Oncogenesis·2017
Same author

Effects of secondary metabolites from marine algae on feeding by the sea urchin,Lytechinus variegatus.

Journal of chemical ecology·2014
Same author

Engineering polarization rotation in a ferroelectric superlattice.

Physical review letters·2012
Same author

Use of boiled cartilage as a nasal implant; case report.

Eye, ear, nose & throat monthly·2010
Same author

Role of columellar and septocolumellar sutures in rhinoplasty.

Archives of otolaryngology·2010
Same author

Training and management of a multisite neuropsychological testing protocol for the Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study evaluating on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft procedures.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2007
Same journal

Does prior percutaneous coronary revascularization negatively affect the outcomes of subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting?

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Lymph Node Dissection and Chylothorax - Balancing Oncologic Benefit Against Morbidity.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Preserved Antegrade Pulmonary Blood Flow in Bidirectional Glenn: Outcomes and Considerations for Staged Palliation.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Impact of High SUVmax on Recurrence by Resection Strategy in Stage IA Adenocarcinoma ≤2 cm.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Preoperative Treatment for Stage II NSCLC Requires Multidimensional Consideration.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
See all related articles

Healthcare providers perceive risk-adjusted outcomes data as valuable for assessing and improving cardiac care quality. Further research is needed to refine measures for better clinical decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Informatics
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Healthcare outcomes data is increasingly recognized for its potential in clinical practice.
  • Understanding provider perceptions is crucial for effective implementation of outcomes measurement.
  • Previous research has explored the utility of outcomes data in healthcare settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore healthcare providers' perceptions regarding the use of health care outcomes data in clinical practice.
  • To identify attitudes and concerns of key providers concerning outcomes data utilization.
  • To debate the strengths and weaknesses of risk-adjusted outcomes data for quality assessment and improvement.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative data collection through two workshops at a symposium on outcomes data in June 1994.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussions focused on the potential use of outcomes data in clinical settings.
  • Exploration of provider attitudes, concerns, and the debate on risk-adjusted outcomes data.

    • Main Results:

    • Healthcare providers generally agreed on the potential of risk-adjusted cardiac care outcomes for assessing and improving quality.
    • Key providers' attitudes and concerns formed the basis for workshop discussions.
    • Participants acknowledged that current research is an initial step, highlighting the need for improved measures.

    Conclusions:

    • Risk-adjusted outcomes data holds promise for enhancing the quality of cardiac patient care.
    • There is a consensus among providers on the value of this data for quality assessment and improvement.
    • Further advancements in measurement are necessary to provide clinicians with superior information for medical practice.