Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prediction error variances for interbreed genetic evaluations

L D Van Vleck1, L V Cundiff

  • 1Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA, Lincoln, NE 68583-0908.

Journal of Animal Science
|August 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Life cycle efficiency of beef production: IX. Relationship between residual feed intake of heifers and cow efficiency ratios based on harvest, carcass, and wholesale cut weight outputs.

Journal of animal science·2018
Same author

Life cycle efficiency of beef production: VIII. Relationship between residual feed intake of heifers and subsequent cow efficiency ratios.

Journal of animal science·2016
Same author

Sire breed effect on beef longissimus mineral concentrations and their relationships with carcass and palatability traits.

Meat science·2015
Same author

Polymorphisms in calpastatin and mu-calpain genes are associated with beef iron content.

Animal genetics·2013
Same author

Estimation of heritability and genetic trend in populations at a physiological limit.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013
Same author

Variance of prediction error with mixed model equations when relationships are ignored.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013

Adjusting expected progeny differences (EPD) between breeds requires careful analysis. This study reveals that while confidence ranges for breed adjustments are small, they are underestimated if within-breed sire effects are ignored.

Area of Science:

  • Animal breeding and genetics
  • Statistical genetics
  • Quantitative genetics

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of genetic merit across different cattle breeds is crucial for effective breeding programs.
  • The Meat Animal Research Center (MARC) provides a common environment for evaluating reference sires from various breeds.
  • Adjusting expected progeny differences (EPD) to a common base year and breed requires accounting for breed-specific genetic trends.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the confidence ranges for breed adjustments in expected progeny differences (EPD).
  • To assess the accuracies of interbreed EPD comparisons.
  • To evaluate the impact of ignoring within-breed sire effects on confidence range estimations.

Main Methods:

  • Application of statistical principles and algebraic methods to analyze EPD data from a common environment evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculation of confidence ranges for breed adjustments, considering within-breed sire effects.
  • Evaluation of standard measures of accuracy for interbreed EPD comparisons.

    • Main Results:

    • Apparent confidence ranges for breed adjustments are small but substantially underestimated when within-breed random sire effects are ignored.
    • Correct confidence ranges for breed adjustments remain small.
    • Standard measures of accuracy are not directly applicable to interbreed EPD comparisons; prediction errors are more influenced by within-breed accuracies than adjustment factor variance.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate confidence intervals for interbreed EPD comparisons require accounting for within-breed sire variability.
    • Standard accuracy measures may not be suitable for evaluating the reliability of interbreed genetic predictions.
    • The study provides a framework for predicting genetic differences between bulls of the same or different breeds with appropriate confidence ranges.