Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Switching or sharing in dual-task line-length discrimination?

J Miller1, A M Bonnel

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Perception & Psychophysics
|October 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Divided attention between lyrics and tunes of operatic songs: evidence for independent processing.

Perception & psychophysics·2002
Same author

Exposure effects on music preference and recognition.

Memory & cognition·1998
Same author

Divided attention between simultaneous auditory and visual signals.

Perception & psychophysics·1998
Same author

Dividing attention between the color and the shape of objects.

Perception & psychophysics·1998
Same author

Attentional effects on concurrent psychophysical discriminations: investigations of a sample-size model.

Perception & psychophysics·1994
Same author

The importance of arginine 102 for the substrate specificity of Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·1992

This study investigated attention allocation in dual tasks. Results indicate that individuals share attention between simultaneous tasks rather than switching, supporting attention sharing models.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Attention Studies

Background:

  • Understanding how humans allocate attention between multiple simultaneous tasks is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Existing models propose either switching or sharing of attention resources.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically test switching versus sharing models of attention allocation.
  • To determine if attention is switched or shared between two concurrently relevant tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using line-length discrimination tasks.
  • Experiment 1 varied stimulus duration to test for negative contingencies predicted by switching models.
  • Experiment 2 used a fixed, brief stimulus duration (20 msec) to challenge switching models.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Experiment 1 revealed no negative contingencies between task performance, supporting attention sharing.
  • Experiment 2 showed high accuracy (>75%) with brief stimuli, indicating information processing for both tasks simultaneously.
  • Results contradicted switching models that predict limited processing per trial.

Conclusions:

  • Findings from both experiments consistently support attention sharing models over switching models.
  • Human attention appears capable of processing information from multiple simultaneous tasks concurrently.