Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sequoia over Hemlock: life termination's noniatrogenic third alternative

R F Morgan1

  • 1Antioch University, Santa Barbara.

Psychological Reports
|August 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Dying with dignity is a limited medical choice. This study proposes a new approach: physicians exploring options to prevent death, offering an alternative to medically assisted death.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quintuplet calves and erythrocyte mosaicism.

The Journal of heredity·2010
Same author

Quantitative swab culture versus tissue biopsy: a comparison in chronic wounds.

Ostomy/wound management·2002
Same author

The vacuum-assisted closure device as a bridge to sternal wound closure.

Annals of plastic surgery·2001
Same author

Thrombogenic effects of a nonthrombin-based fibrin sealant compared with thrombin-based fibrin sealant on microvenous anastomoses in a rat model.

Annals of plastic surgery·2000
Same author

Isolated musculocutaneous neuropathy caused by a proximal humeral exostosis.

Neurology·2000
Same author

A pilot study of short- and long-term sequelae to rigid fixation across metacarpal physes in a baboon model.

Annals of plastic surgery·2000

Area of Science:

  • Medical ethics
  • End-of-life care
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Current medical practice often restricts end-of-life choices.
  • The concept of 'dying with dignity' is debated and legally defined.
  • Patient autonomy in end-of-life decisions is a critical ethical consideration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore a novel third option in end-of-life decision-making.
  • To challenge the binary choice between dying with or without dignity.
  • To propose the potential role of physicians in facilitating life-prolonging interventions beyond current scope.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of medical ethics and patient autonomy.
  • Review of existing legal and medical frameworks for end-of-life care.
  • Philosophical exploration of alternative end-of-life pathways.

Main Results:

  • The current framework for end-of-life decisions is restrictive.
  • A third option, focusing on preventing death, is theoretically possible.
  • New medical approaches could potentially extend life beyond current expectations.

Conclusions:

  • Medical ethics should consider a broader spectrum of end-of-life choices.
  • Physicians could play a role in exploring life-prolonging interventions.
  • Further discussion is needed on the feasibility and ethics of a 'not dying' option.

Related Experiment Videos