Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Maintaining the Ineraid cochlear implant

D M Baguley1, Z Vanat, I Court

  • 1Department of Audiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

British Journal of Audiology
|February 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Hyperacusis: a mini review].

Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery·2021
Same author

An audit of UK audiological practice in specialist paediatric oncology centres regarding hearing assessment of children at risk of ototoxicity due to chemotherapy.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2021
Same author

The prevalence of tinnitus in China: a systematic review of the literature.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2021
Same author

Aural fullness and transtympanic ventilation tubes in Ménière's disease: a scoping review.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2019
Same author

Hyperacusis: major research questions.

HNO·2018
Same author

Positive experiences related to living with tinnitus: A cross-sectional survey.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2017
Same journal

Effects of slow- and fast-acting compression on the detection of gaps in narrow bands of noise.

British journal of audiology·2002
Same journal

Measurement of first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds in listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

British journal of audiology·2002
Same journal

Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally.

British journal of audiology·2002
Same journal

Assessing service quality in paediatric audiology and early deaf education.

British journal of audiology·2002
Same journal

Comparison of the electroacoustic characteristics of five hearing aids.

British journal of audiology·2002
Same journal

Use of the 'real-ear to dial difference' to derive real-ear SPL from hearing level obtained with insert earphones.

British journal of audiology·2002
See all related articles

Cochlear implant device maintenance for acquired profound deafness requires frequent repairs, occurring every 2.3 months on average. This high failure rate necessitates implant centers stocking spare parts to minimize patient distress from temporary hearing loss.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

  • Managing acquired profound deafness with cochlear implants demands lifelong device maintenance.
  • The Ineraid cochlear implant is a device requiring ongoing functional upkeep.
  • Patient rehabilitation is a critical component of cochlear implant management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the Cambridge experience with maintaining the Ineraid cochlear implant.
  • To analyze the frequency and patterns of component maintenance over a four-year period.
  • To inform cochlear implant centers about necessary provisions for device repair and spare parts.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 25 patients with Ineraid cochlear implants.
  • Data collection on component maintenance (repairs/replacements) over four years.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of maintenance frequency per patient and per component type.

    • Main Results:

    • Average maintenance (repair/replacement) required every 2.3 months of implant use.
    • Variations in maintenance frequency observed between patients and component types.
    • The failure rate necessitates proactive planning for repairs and spare stock.

    Conclusions:

    • The Ineraid cochlear implant exhibits a maintenance frequency that requires dedicated resources.
    • Implant centers must consider provisioning for repairs and maintaining spare component stock.
    • Device breakdowns, even temporary, can cause significant patient distress, highlighting the importance of reliable device function.