Patient characteristics in cases of chronic severe heart failure with different degrees of left ventricular systolic

S V Eriksson1, J Kjekshus, J Offstad

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Sweden.

Cardiology
|January 1, 1994
PubMed

Insights

Patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure and less impaired heart function were older, more often female, and had slower heart rates. Enalapril treatment improved survival, masking prognosis differences seen in the placebo group.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Demographic differences in severe chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) concerning left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVD) remain unclear.
  • NYHA Class IV patients in the CONSENSUS-I trial underwent optional evaluation for LVD severity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if demographic characteristics differ between severe CHF patients with varying degrees of LVD.
  • To investigate the prognostic implications of LVD severity in CHF patients, with and without enalapril treatment.

Main Methods:

  • M-mode echocardiography was used to assess left ventricular fractional shortening (FS) in 54 severe CHF patients.
  • Demographic data (age, sex, heart rate) were compared between patients with FS above and below the median (14%).
  • Two-year follow-up data from the CONSENSUS-I trial were analyzed for survival differences based on FS and treatment group.

Main Results:

  • Patients with FS above the median (less severe LVD) were older, more frequently female, and had lower heart rates compared to those with FS below the median.
  • In the placebo group, higher FS (less severe LVD) correlated with significantly better prognosis.
  • This survival benefit associated with less severe LVD was not observed in the enalapril-treated group, suggesting enalapril mitigated the prognostic impact of LVD severity.

Conclusions:

  • Demographic profiles differ between severe CHF patients with less versus more severe LVD.
  • While less severe LVD predicted better survival in placebo patients, enalapril treatment obscured this difference, indicating a positive impact of the drug on prognosis regardless of baseline LVD severity.

Related Concept Videos

Pathophysiology of Heart Failure01:17

Pathophysiology of Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is a progressive syndrome involving ventricles that leads to inadequate cardiac output. It can be classified based on location and output or ejection fraction. Ejection fraction (EF) is an essential measurement in the diagnosis and surveillance of HF. Reduced EF corresponds to systolic heart failure (HFrEF). However, HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is becoming increasingly prevalent. Also known as diastolic HF, this form of HF is related to aging. The...
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology01:29

Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology

Systolic Heart Failure and Compensatory MechanismsSystolic heart failure (also termed HFrEF, Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction) is the most prevalent type of heart filure. It results in a decreased volume of blood being pumped from the ventricle. The aortic arch and carotid sinuses have baroreceptors that detect reduced blood pressure, triggering the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) to release epinephrine and norepinephrine. Initially, this response aims to boost heart rate and...
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations01:26

Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations

Heart failure (HF) manifests primarily as dyspnea, fatigue, and fluid retention, resulting in peripheral and pulmonary edema. Symptoms may vary depending on which ventricle is more affected, left or right.Left-Sided Heart FailureAlso known as left ventricular failure, this condition results from the left ventricle's inability to fill or eject sufficient blood into the systemic circulation. It leads to pulmonary congestion, which occurs when the left ventricle fails to eject blood effectively...
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation01:30

Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

Heart failure can be classified in various ways, with the most common classifications based on physical activity limitations, disease progression, severity, and treatment strategies.The Functional Classification of Heart Failure divides patients into four categories based on physical activity limitation due to symptom burden.Class I: Patients in this class have cardiac disease but no physical activity limitations. Ordinary activities like walking, climbing stairs, or routine tasks do not cause...
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions01:30

Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions

The first step in nursing management of a patient with heart failure involves thoroughly assessing the patient's medical history.Subjective Data: Obtain the patient's medical history of coronary artery disease, hypertension, myocardial infarction, and symptoms like dyspnea, orthopnea, and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea.Objective Data: Conduct a physical examination to identify findings such as jugular vein distention, pulmonary crackles, tachycardia, murmurs, peripheral edema, and vital signs,...
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care01:29

Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

Managing cardiomyopathy involves addressing underlying or precipitating causes, treating heart failure with medications, and implementing dietary changes and a balanced exercise and rest regimen.Lifestyle ModificationsCardiomyopathy patients should adopt a low-sodium diet to reduce fluid retention and manage heart failure. A personalized exercise and rest plan helps maintain physical fitness without overstraining the heart. Avoiding alcohol and tobacco is essential to prevent further damage to...