Determination of left ventricular volume by two-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance

M C Herregods1, G De Paep, B Bijnens

  • 1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

European Heart Journal
|August 1, 1994
PubMed

Insights

A new 2D echocardiography method accurately measures left ventricular volume in healthy volunteers. This technique shows minimal variability and is comparable to reference magnetic resonance imaging, even with poor echogenicity.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Echocardiography

Background:

  • Accurate assessment of left ventricular (LV) volume is crucial for cardiovascular diagnosis.
  • Traditional echocardiographic methods may face limitations in precision and accuracy.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often considered the reference standard for LV volume quantification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a novel two-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic delineation method for determining left ventricular volume.
  • To compare the accuracy of this new echocardiographic technique against magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  • To assess the reproducibility and potential advantages of the new echocardiographic method.

Main Methods:

  • A newly developed 2D echocardiographic delineation method was used to measure LV volumes in 12 healthy volunteers.
  • Measurements included left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV).
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was also calculated and compared with MRI reference values.

Main Results:

  • Echocardiographically determined LVEDV was 123 ± 12 ml versus 121 ± 12 ml by MRI.
  • Echocardiographically determined LVESV was 41 ± 7 ml versus 37 ± 6 ml by MRI.
  • Echocardiographically determined LVEF was 67 ± 4% versus 70 ± 5% by MRI, with no statistical differences observed for any parameter.

Conclusions:

  • The novel 2D echocardiographic delineation method accurately quantifies left ventricular volume in healthy individuals.
  • The method demonstrated minimal interstudy and inter-observer variability, suggesting high reproducibility.
  • Advantages include a dynamic display for precise edge-detection and easy correction, enhancing accuracy even in cases of poor echogenicity.