Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
Quality of life on enalapril after acute myocardial infarction
O Ekeberg1, T O Klemsdal, S E Kjeldsen
1Department of Internal Medicine, Ullevaal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Insights
Enalapril did not significantly improve quality of life after myocardial infarction compared to placebo. However, factors like angina, heart failure, and smoking negatively impacted patients' quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Research
- Quality of Life Studies
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (MI) significantly impacts patient quality of life.
- Understanding factors influencing post-MI recovery is crucial for patient management.
- Enalapril is an ACE inhibitor often used in cardiovascular disease management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effect of enalapril versus placebo on quality of life 4-6 months post-MI.
- To identify demographic and clinical factors associated with quality of life after MI.
Main Methods:
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
- Quality of life assessed using Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Physical Symptoms Distress Index (PSDI), Work Performance Scale (WPS), and Life Satisfaction Index (LSI).
- Study included 36 women and 96 men, with data analyzed for demographic and clinical subgroups.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in overall quality of life between enalapril and placebo groups.
- Men reported better quality of life than women; non-smokers/ex-smokers reported better quality of life than smokers.
- Patients with angina pectoris or congestive heart failure reported worse quality of life.
Conclusions:
- Enalapril treatment did not improve quality of life post-MI compared to placebo.
- Angina, heart failure, and smoking are associated with reduced quality of life in post-MI patients.
- Further research may explore interventions targeting these specific factors to enhance recovery.
Abstract:
Quality of life was assessed 4-6 months after an acute myocardial infarction in a randomized double-blind study of enalapril versus placebo. Quality of life was evaluated using the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), the Physical Symptoms Distress Index (PSDI), the Work Performance Scale (WPS) and the Life Satisfaction Index (LSI). The study comprised 36 women (aged 46-85 years, mean 68) and 96 males (aged 39-81 years, mean 62). Quality of life did not differ significantly between patients treated with enalapril versus placebo. The scores were (enalapril vs placebo, mean +/- SE): average NHP 15.4 +/- 2.3 vs 17.1 +/- 2.3; PSDI 9.5 +/- 1.0 vs 10.8 +/- 0.9; WPS 19.8 +/- 2.0 vs 19.4 +/- 1.4; LSI 24.1 +/- 1.0 vs 22.5 +/- 1.4. Men reported a better quality of life than women on most assessments, and non-smokers and ex-smokers better than smokers. Patients with moderate or severe angina pectoris had a worse quality of life measured by PSDI and NHP than patients with minimal or no angina pectoris. Patients with congestive heart failure had a higher PSDI than those without (13.6 +/- 1.7 vs 9.4 +/- 0.7, P < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in the NHP scores. In conclusion, quality of life was similar in enalapril and placebo-treated patients after an acute myocardial infarction. However, it was reduced in patients with angina pectoris or heart failure and in those who continued smoking.
More Related Videos
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina V: Nursing Management
Heart Failure V: Medical Management