Periwound skin microcirculation of venous leg ulcers
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2026

Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg
Published on: November 19, 2019
1Miami Heart Research Institute, Miami Beach, Florida 33140.
Abstract:
Chronic venous ulceration has an estimated prevalence of from 0.06 to 1.3% with about 57 to 80% of patients with leg ulcers having demonstrable venous disease. The sequence of events whereby chronic venous insufficiency leads to leg skin ulceration is not yet worked out. Venous hypertension may set the stage for subsequent ulcer development via linkages to observed changes in skin microvessel metrics, morphology, rheology, permeability, hemodynamics, and the interstitium. Periulcer measurements show decreased transcutaneous oxygen and elevated carbon dioxide tensions, yet the skin blood perfusion measured with laser Doppler fluxometry (LDF) is reported to be elevated. This elevated perfusion, (Q), could be due to independent changes in blood velocity (U), and volume (V), with different mechanistic implications depending on the mode. Thus, we sought to determine the relative contributions of these two components with the aim of clarifying the mechanism responsible for the reported skin flow changes. Patients studied (n = 16) had unilateral venous ulcers, an ankle/brachial BP index > 0.8, and venous pathology demonstrated by duplex imaging. Ulcer areas ranged from 0.6 to 76.9 cm2 (mean = 13.7 cm2) and were present for 2 to 144 months, mean = 32. With the patient supine, Q (ml/min/100 g), V (%), and U (mm/sec) were measured by LDF (Vasamedics, BPM403A) at two to three sites on periulcer skin and compared with measurements at corresponding sites on the nonulcerated limb at local skin temperatures of 35 and 44. Results confirm an elevation in basal periulcer flow (7.0 vs 1.8 ml/min/100 g, P = 0.001) and show this to be due to elevations in both circulating blood volume (1.24 vs 0.62%, P < 0.001) and velocity (1.23 vs 0.65 mm/sec, P = .004). Maximal Q, V, and U were also higher on the ulcer leg, being for Q, 11.2 vs 6.42 ml/min/100 g, P = 0.03; for V, 1.49 vs 1.13%, P = .002; and for U, 1.76 vs 1.33 mm/sec, P = 0.020. Expressing each leg's basal values as a percentage of its own maximal response shows the ulcerated leg to have higher values for Q, V, and U, with (ulcer leg/control leg) ratios being 2.5, 1.8, and 1.4, respectively. These findings show that the LDF perfusion increase is due to roughly equal increases in microvessel circulating blood volume and velocity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Related Concept Videos
Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system as it...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above the...
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Varicose Veins I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Diabetic Foot Ulcer

