Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Attention and apparent motion

T Horowitz¹, A Treisman

¹Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley 94730.

|January 1, 1994

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Short-range motion is processed in parallel and affected by adaptation, unlike long-range motion which requires attention. This study proposes a feature-integration theory to explain these visual search differences.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Isolated medial temporal lobe amnesia (MTLA): Predictor of cerebral amyloidosis or marker of phenotype-specific vulnerability?

Revue neurologique·2026

Same author

RING1 missense variants reveal sensitivity of DNA damage repair to H2A monoubiquitination dosage during neurogenesis.

Nature communications·2024

Same author

Innovative treatments for meningiomas.

Revue neurologique·2023

Same author

Contribution of nuclear medicine to the diagnosis and management of primary brain tumours.

Revue neurologique·2023

Same author

Molecular imaging in Parkinsonism: The essential for clinical practice and future perspectives.

Revue neurologique·2022

Same author

Semantic processing in dichotic listening? A replication.

Memory & cognition·2013

Same journal

Comment on 'angle illusion on a picture's surface' by Hammad et al. (2008).

Spatial vision·2009

Same journal

Feature-based attentional modulation increases with stimulus separation in divided-attention tasks.

Spatial vision·2009

Same journal

Spatial distance between target and irrelevant patch modulates detection in a texture segmentation task.

Spatial vision·2009

Same journal

Inhibition related impairments of coherent motion perception in the attention-induced motion blindness paradigm.

Spatial vision·2009

Same journal

Recognition units in reading: backward masking experiments.

Spatial vision·2009

Same journal

Spatial-temporal modeling of interactive image interpretation.

Spatial vision·2009

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Visual perception
Cognitive psychology
Neuroscience

Background:

Previous research suggests parallel processing for short-range motion and serial processing for long-range motion in visual search.
These findings have been replicated, indicating distinct processing mechanisms for different motion ranges.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate dissociations between short-range and long-range motion processing in visual search.
To propose a feature-integration account for apparent motion based on experimental findings.

Main Methods:

Utilizing bicontrast stimuli and prior adaptation to target motion direction.
Comparing search performance for short-range versus long-range motion targets under experimental manipulations.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

Search for short-range motion targets was impaired by bicontrast stimuli and adaptation.
Search for long-range motion targets was not impaired by these factors; adaptation even facilitated it.
Distinct processing mechanisms for short-range (parallel, adaptation-sensitive) and long-range (serial, attention-dependent) motion were identified.

Conclusions:

A feature-integration account of apparent motion is proposed, differentiating specialized parallel detectors for short-range motion from attention-based linking for long-range motion.
The findings highlight the complex and distinct neural pathways involved in processing different types of visual motion.