Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Colon Ascendens Stent Peritonitis (CASP) - a Standardized Model for Polymicrobial Abdominal Sepsis
Published on: December 18, 2010
Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry
1Coordinating Center for Collaborative Studies in Coronary Artery Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle 98105.
Insights
Clinical factors like age and vessel disease significantly impact long-term survival in Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) patients. Poor survival for those with three-vessel disease and low ejection fraction highlights revascularization importance.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
- Public Health
Background:
- The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) provided a unique dataset to analyze long-term outcomes.
- Understanding the natural history of coronary artery disease (CAD) is crucial for patient management.
- Medical treatment outcomes for CAD patients without prior surgery are essential historical data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the impact of clinical, angiographic, and demographic factors on long-term survival in medically treated Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) patients.
- To report revascularization rates within the CASS cohort.
- To provide insights into the natural progression of coronary artery disease.
Main Methods:
- Survival analysis of 23,467 Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) patients initially treated medically.
- Follow-up duration ranged from 0 to 17 years (median 12 years), with vital status known for 95.8% of patients.
- Statistical methods included log-rank tests, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox proportional-hazards regression.
Main Results:
- Age, number of diseased vessels, congestive heart failure score, and ejection fraction were key predictors of survival.
- Twelve-year survival rates varied significantly: 88% for zero-vessel disease to 40% for three-vessel disease.
- Survival decreased markedly with lower ejection fractions, with 12-year survival as low as 21% for ejection fractions 0-34%.
Conclusions:
- The study elucidates the natural history of coronary artery disease in a large, medically treated cohort.
- Findings underscore the critical prognostic importance of the number of diseased vessels and left ventricular function (ejection fraction).
- The persistently poor survival in patients with three-vessel disease and low ejection fraction reinforces the consideration for revascularization in such cases.
Background:
This study describes the impact of clinical, angiographic, and demographic characteristics on the long-term survival of Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) patients while they were under medical treatment. Revascularization rates for the population are also provided.
Methods And Results:
All CASS patients who had not received heart surgery before enrollment (23,467 patients) were included in this survival analysis while they were under medical treatment or surveillance. Follow-up time ranged from 0 to 17 years (median, 12 years). Long-term vital status is known for 95.8% of these patients. Log-rank tests, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox proportional-hazards regression are used to describe and assess the impact of patient characteristics on survival. Characteristics that had a significant impact on survival, in order of observed explanatory power, are age, number of diseased vessels, congestive heart failure score, smoking history, ejection fraction, sex, presence of left main coronary artery disease, presence of diabetes, left ventricular wall motion score, presence of other illnesses, history of myocardial infarction, and presence of left main equivalent disease. Overall, 12-year survival for patients with zero-, one-, two- and three-vessel disease is 88%, 74%, 59%, and 40%, respectively. Twelve-year survival for patients with at least one diseased vessel and ejection fractions in the ranges of 50% to 100%, 35% to 49%, and 0% to 34% is 73%, 54%, and 21%, respectively. High myocardial jeopardy, high anginal class, and two or three proximal diseased vessels characterize the profile of patients most likely to have received surgical treatment during follow-up.
Conclusions:
These results contribute to the understanding of the natural history of coronary artery disease and are also of historical interest. The poor survival of patients with three-vessel disease and low ejection fractions continues to emphasize the importance of considering revascularization for these patients.
Related Concept Videos
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
