Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating consultation psychiatry residents

B Templeton1, H S Selarnick

  • 1Department of Mental Health Sciences, Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192.

General Hospital Psychiatry
|September 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The quality of psychiatric residency : the assessment of programs and options for distributing psychiatric residents in the service of health care reform.

Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry·2014
Same author

Competence in medicine.

Medical teacher·2014
Same author

Interrater reliability in evaluating trainee interviewing skills.

Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry·2014
Same author

Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible for airway obstruction in children.

The Laryngoscope·2001
Same author

Alcohol-impaired driving: the family's tragedy and the public's health.

JAMA·1997
Same author

USMLE (United States medical licensing examination) step 1 examination. Legal vulnerability.

Evaluation & the health professions·1996

This report offers 13 recommendations for evaluating psychiatric residents on consultation-liaison (C-L) services. Key suggestions include direct observation and varied assessment methods to improve psychiatric resident evaluations.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Psychiatry
  • Healthcare Administration

Background:

  • Effective evaluation of psychiatric residents is crucial for C-L services.
  • Current evaluation methods may lack comprehensive assessment strategies.
  • Standardized approaches are needed for consistent performance ratings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose evidence-based recommendations for evaluating psychiatric residents.
  • To enhance the quality and reliability of resident assessments in C-L settings.
  • To guide C-L unit chiefs in developing robust evaluation protocols.

Main Methods:

  • Extensive review of existing literature on performance evaluation.
  • Development of 13 distinct recommendations for resident assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inclusion of traditional and nontraditional assessment techniques.

    • Main Results:

    • Recommendations cover written exams, problem-solving assessments, and case presentation inventories.
    • Emphasis on direct observation of resident performance.
    • Acknowledgement of challenges in achieving interrater reliability with subjective ratings.

    Conclusions:

    • Implementing these recommendations can improve psychiatric resident evaluations.
    • A multi-faceted approach to assessment is vital for C-L services.
    • Further research may be needed to refine subjective rating reliability.