Related Experiment Videos
Enhancing patient well-being: advocacy or negotiation?
1St Mary's Hospital, London.
Journal of Medical Ethics
|September 1, 1994
Summary
Nurses should empower patients rather than act as advocates. This approach helps patients assert control over their health, promoting well-being and minimizing suffering within multidisciplinary teams.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Ethics
- Patient Advocacy
- Healthcare Professional Roles
Background:
- The United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visitors (UKCC) identifies patient advocacy as crucial for professional nursing.
- Existing literature explores the benefits and drawbacks of nurses acting as patient advocates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the role of nurses as patient advocates.
- To explore the moral issues surrounding nursing advocacy.
- To propose an alternative model for patient well-being and suffering minimization.
Main Methods:
- Critical analysis of the concept of advocacy in nursing.
- Examination of moral issues related to patient advocacy.
- Discussion of multidisciplinary team negotiation with patients.
Main Results:
- The role of patient advocate is debated, with moral complexities arising.
- Negotiation within multidisciplinary teams is suggested to improve patient outcomes.
- Empowerment, enabling patients to control factors affecting their lives, is presented as a more effective approach than advocacy.
Conclusions:
- The primary role of healthcare professionals, including nurses, is patient empowerment.
- Empowerment enables patients to assert control, promoting well-being and reducing suffering.
- This shifts the focus from advocacy to enabling patient self-determination.
Keywords:
Professional Patient Relationship