Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
Published on: March 13, 2017
A new coincidence model for single particle counters, Part II: Advances and applications
J Z Knapp1, A Lieberman, L R Abramson
1R & D Associates, Inc., Somerset, New Jersey.
New methods refine United States Pharmacopeia (USP) particle contamination assays by introducing a count efficiency parameter to control errors in small SVI containers. This improves accuracy in detecting contaminants in injectable drug products.
Area of Science:
- Pharmaceutical Science
- Analytical Chemistry
- Quality Control
Background:
- Current United States Pharmacopeia (USP) <788> standards for particle contamination in small volume injectable (SVI) containers have limitations.
- High particle concentrations in small SVI containers lead to undercount and false count errors due to signal coincidence in light extinction counters.
- Existing methods struggle to accurately assess detector performance across various particle sizes and concentrations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To refine accuracy and control errors in USP <788> particle contamination assays for SVI containers.
- To introduce and validate a count efficiency parameter for single particle light extinction counters.
- To develop a test protocol for evaluating and controlling coincidence errors in particle counting.
Main Methods:
- Development of the 'Particle Triggered Poisson Model' for a more accurate statistical model of particle counting.
- Introduction of a concentration measure accounting for particle size effects on detector capability.
- Creation of a simple test protocol combining theoretical concepts with counter replicability to evaluate detector performance.
Main Results:
- The proposed methods enable accurate quantification and control of coincidence errors in particle counting.
- Experimental data can be used to calculate detector count efficiency.
- A contour of particle size and count is defined to control undercount and false counts in USP <788> assays.
Conclusions:
- The developed methodology and test protocol effectively address signal coincidence errors in USP <788> SVI particle assays.
- A single particle size test is insufficient for evaluating detector performance; a comprehensive approach is necessary.
- The findings support the intended accuracy and reliability of USP <788> SVI particle contamination testing.
Related Concept Videos
Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...
Mass Analyzers: Overview
Mass Analyzers: Common Types
2D NMR: Overview of Homonuclear Correlation Techniques
COSY90 is the standard two-dimensional (2D) COSY experiment that...
2D NMR: Overview of Heteronuclear Correlation Techniques

