Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biomechanical concerns with fixed partial dentures involving implants

C E English1

  • 1VA Medical Center, Augusta, GA 30904.

Implant Dentistry
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Application of metal-ceramic technology for anterior fixed prosthodontic restoration.

Practical procedures & aesthetic dentistry : PPAD·2001
Same author

Prosthodontic prescriptions for mandibular implant overdentures--Part II.

Dental implantology update·1996
Same author

Prosthodontic prescriptions for mandibular implant overdentures--Part I.

Dental implantology update·1996
Same author

Hygiene, maintenance, and prosthodontic concerns for the infirm implant patient: clinical report and discussion.

Implant dentistry·1995
Same author

Bar patterns in implant prosthodontics.

Implant dentistry·1994
Same author

Restoration of the maxillary arch with a precision-milled double-bar prosthesis.

International journal of dental symposia·1994

Improper design of implant-supported fixed partial dentures can lead to biomechanical failures. Addressing factors like leverage, torsion, and occlusal overload is crucial for long-term success.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Dental Implantology
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Fixed partial dentures (FPDs) supported by implants are common restorative solutions.
  • Biomechanical considerations are paramount for the longevity and success of implant-supported FPDs.
  • Understanding potential failure modes is essential for clinicians and designers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss nine critical biomechanical factors in the design and fabrication of implant-supported FPDs.
  • To highlight the detrimental effects of specific biomechanical challenges.
  • To provide insights into areas requiring careful consideration during treatment planning and execution.

Main Methods:

  • Review and discussion of established biomechanical principles relevant to implant dentistry.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of clinical scenarios and design choices that can lead to adverse outcomes.
  • Identification and categorization of key biomechanical risk factors.

    • Main Results:

    • Leverage, torsion, occlusal overload, and poor oral hygiene are identified as significant detrimental factors.
    • Specific areas of concern include cantilevers, pier abutments, excessive fixed spans, and nonrigid connectors.
    • Off-axis loading, unfavorable occlusal plane to implant height ratios, inadequate support/distribution, and mandibular flexure/torsion also pose risks.

    Conclusions:

    • Careful consideration of biomechanical principles is essential for successful implant-supported FPDs.
    • Mitigating risks associated with leverage, torsion, and occlusal forces is critical.
    • Optimizing design and fabrication based on these factors enhances prosthetic longevity and patient outcomes.