Related Experiment Videos
Genotyping compared with protein phenotyping of the common apolipoprotein E polymorphism
P S Hansen1, L U Gerdes, I C Klausen
1Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology A, Aarhus Amtssygehus University Hospital, Denmark.
Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry
|January 31, 1994
Summary
This study compared apolipoprotein E (apo E) genotyping methods in 460 men. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and isoelectric focusing (IEF) showed high concordance, validating PCR for apo E genotype determination.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Biochemistry
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Apolipoprotein E (apo E) plays a crucial role in lipid metabolism and is associated with various diseases.
- Accurate determination of apo E genotypes is essential for genetic epidemiological studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based genotyping with isoelectric focusing (IEF) for determining apolipoprotein E (apo E) genotypes.
- To assess the reliability of current methods for apo E genotype analysis in a large cohort.
Main Methods:
- Genotyping of 460 Danish men using PCR to amplify a specific DNA fragment.
- Restriction endonuclease cleavage of the amplified fragment to identify polymorphic sites.
- Comparison of PCR-derived genotypes with phenotypes determined by isoelectric focusing (IEF) and immunoblotting.
Main Results:
- A high degree of concordance was observed between PCR genotyping and IEF phenotyping (98.0%).
- Discrepancies in 9 cases (2.0%) were primarily attributed to technical issues with IEF ('faint bands') or potentially rare mutations.
- The findings support the reliability of PCR-based methods for apo E genotyping.
Conclusions:
- Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a reliable and accurate method for determining apolipoprotein E (apo E) genotypes.
- The study provides reassurance regarding the validity of genetic epidemiological studies utilizing apo E genotyping.
- Potential sources of error in IEF-based phenotyping were identified, highlighting the importance of method validation.