Selective attention to global and local structure of objects: alternative measures of nontarget processing

When individuals are asked to report either the global or the local level of structure in a stimulus pattern located inside a relevant object, distractors located within an irrelevant object will interfere only if they are at the same level of structure as that of the target item (Briand, 1993; Paquet & Merikle, 1988). The basis of this level-specific filtering is unclear, as is the true level of semantic analysis for the ignored items. In the present series of experiments, multiple measures of nontarget processing were used to assess concurrent interference, negative priming, and a category effect supposedly reflecting a more abstract level of semantic analysis. These different indicants were assessed in three experiments in which form, color, or a spatial precue was used to direct attention to the relevant stimulus pattern. Overall, cuing by form produced poorer spatial selectivity, whereas spatial precues and color led to better selectivity. However, the three measures of nontarget processing were not equally affected by these manipulations, with global information showing more evidence for semantic analysis than for local analysis regardless of the type of selection cue used. The results suggest that inhibition is not the basis of target selection when ignored items are local, but that it may be used when global items are ignored.