Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical value of bone densitometry

D J Sartoris1

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, Medical Center 92103-8756.

AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|July 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Imaging Acute Knee Injuries.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

Scoliosis in elderly and age-related bone loss: a population-based study.

Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry·2004
Same author

Quantitative computed tomography of spine: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional imaging approaches in clinical practice.

Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry·2001
Same author

Quantitative computed tomography in the evaluation of spinal osteoporosis following spinal cord injury.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2001
Same author

Imaging characteristics and epidemiologic features of atypical mycobacterial infections involving the musculoskeletal system.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
Same author

Delayed diagnosis of primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the sacrum.

Clinical imaging·2001
Same journal

The Banality of Cancer: Entropy As a Third Pillar of Lung Nodule Risk Assessment.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

A Narrow Window for Artificial Intelligence-Generated Synthetic Temporal Bone CT From MRI.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

From Uncertainty to Actionable Management: The Isolated Abnormal Axillary Lymph Node.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

Beyond Detection: Translating Artificial Intelligence-Driven Opportunistic Screening Into Clinical Action.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

Navigating PSMA PET Radiopharmaceuticals: Clinical and Operational Factors.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

From Mesenteric Ischemia to Intestinal Stroke.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
See all related articles

Noninvasive bone mass measurement, or bone densitometry, is a valuable clinical tool. Recent studies support its use in identifying women at risk for osteoporosis and candidacy for estrogen-replacement therapy.

Area of Science:

  • Osteoporosis Research
  • Bone Health Assessment

Background:

  • The clinical utility of noninvasive bone mass measurement remains a subject of debate.
  • Previous editorials have questioned the limitations of bone densitometry.
  • Predicting bone density using anthropometric and historical data has proven largely unsuccessful.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide insight into the controversy surrounding the clinical value of noninvasive bone mass measurement.
  • To demonstrate that bone densitometry is a beneficial procedure for selected patients.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent studies supporting bone densitometry.
  • Analysis of existing literature on bone mass measurement limitations.
  • Synthesis of current concepts regarding bone densitometry's role.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Recent research increasingly supports the judicious use of bone densitometry.
  • Bone densitometry is effective in identifying women at risk for osteoporosis.
  • It aids in selecting candidates for estrogen-replacement therapy.

Conclusions:

  • Bone densitometry is a clinically valuable tool for assessing bone mass.
  • The procedure is indicated for selected patients, particularly women nearing menopause.
  • Evidence supports densitometry for osteoporosis risk assessment and treatment guidance.