Homograft replacement of the aortic valve and root as a functional unit

Homograft replacement of the aortic valve has inherent advantages for the patient in terms of decreased incidence of thromboembolism, endocarditis, and anticoagulation-related complications. Limitations in its use stem from a significant incidence of postoperative aortic regurgitation, related to difficulty with consistent commissural and sinotubular geometry when inserted in the subcoronary position. To minimize this complication, we used a homograft as a functional unit in 71 patients between 1986 and May 1993, either as a root replacement (n = 58) or as an intraaortic inclusion cylinder (n = 13). There were 4 pulmonary and 67 aortic homografts. Mean age of the 16 female and 55 male patients was 42 +/- 19 years (range, 0.6 to 84 years). Thirty patients had predominantly aortic regurgitation, 19 aortic stenosis, 18 mixed aortic valve disease, and 4 primary aneurysmal disease. Eighteen (25.4%) had infective endocarditis. Thirty-five patients (49%) had a previous operation on the aortic valve. Hospital mortality was 14.1% (10/71), 0% for inclusion cylinders and 17.2% (10/58) for root replacements (p = not significant). Recent follow-up was obtained in all hospital survivors. Mean follow-up period was 35 months (range, 1 to 81 months). There were six late deaths, 1/13 for inclusion cylinders and 5/48 for root replacements. Actuarial survival at 5 years was 74.9% +/- 5.6%. Reoperation was required in 3 patients (all with root replacements), 1 for postoperative endocarditis, 1 for left coronary ostial obstruction, and 1 for late onset of aortic dilatation and regurgitation (pulmonary homograft used as a root replacement). Two patients currently have asymptomatic greater than 2/4 aortic regurgitation. Freedom from significant aortic regurgitation was 88% +/- 7% at 6-year follow-up. More consistent maintenance of the sinotubular and commissural geometry of the aortic homograft may be achieved with the root replacement or the inclusion cylinder techniques. This may reduce the incidence of postoperative aortic regurgitation and further benefit the patient by reducing the need for reoperation in the future.