[Reliability of imaging procedures in multi-visceral gynecologic operations of the pelvis]

Between March 1989 and December 1992, a total of 85 pelvic exenterations were performed in the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of the University of Mainz. To assess the accuracy of preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computer Tomography (CT) with regard to tumour localisation and spread, the results of 28 MRI and 14 CT examinations were compared with the postoperative histological findings. For this widely varying patient group that had undergone a broad range of previous treatments, MRI produced an accurate forecast in 56% of cases (CT, 36%). In 33% of the patients tested, the diagnosis based on MRI was partially correct (CT, 43%), whereas the MRI results fundamentally disagreed with the actual findings in 11% of cases (CT, 21%). We conclude that both MRI and CT are of great value in the planning of operations and for informing patients about their condition; however, in individual cases, an intraoperative quick-section diagnosis is necessary to provide details of tumour spread. If the extent of tumour spread is uncertain, the results of CT and/or MRI should not deter the surgeon from the radicality of the planned operative intervention.