Effect of zatebradine, a specific bradycardic agent, on ischemia-induced arrhythmias in anesthetized rabbits

The effects of the specific bradycardic agent, zatebradine (UL-FS 49), on ventricular arrhythmias occurring during an acute ischemia were compared to those of verapamil. Anesthetized rabbits were submitted to a ligation of the left circumflex coronary artery for 20 min. Zatebradine (150 and 750 micrograms/kg, i.v.) dose-dependently reduced heart rate, but changed neither the left ventricular pressure nor the (+)dp/dtmax. In comparison, verapamil (150 and 750 micrograms/kg, i.v.) reduced heart rate, systemic blood pressure, left ventricular pressure and (+)dp/dtmax. The incidence of ventricular premature beats occurring during acute ischemia was changed neither by zatebradine nor by verapamil. Ventricular fibrillation, occurring in 36% of the saline-treated rabbits, was reduced to 18% in the presence of 750 micrograms/kg of zatebradine and 0% with verapamil (750 micrograms/kg, p < 0.05). The action of zatebradine on ischemia-induced ventricular fibrillation, albeit limited, was completely reversed by atrial pacing to the predrug heart rate. To further investigate the mechanisms involved in the antiarrhythmic potential of both zatebradine and verapamil, their electrophysiological actions were compared in canine Purkinje fibers. Both zatebradine and verapamil induced a dose-dependent increase in action potential duration (APD) measured at 90% repolarization. The APDs measured during the plateau level (APD30) and at 50% of the repolarization (APD50) were shortened by verapamil and increased by zatebradine showing that at the concentrations used, zatebradine did not exhibit any calcium antagonistic activity when compared to verapamil. The results of the present study suggest that the specific bradycardic agent zatebradine showed a beneficial action mainly because of its anti-ischemic properties. However, the present studies performed in anesthetized rabbits suggest that in this species pure reduction in heart rate is not sufficient to entirely prevent ischemic arrhythmias.