Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Laparoscopic sterilization. A follow-up study]

J A Schou1

  • 1Farsø Sygehus, kirurgisk afdeling.

Ugeskrift for Laeger
|March 7, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic sterilization (LS) is as effective as laparotomy (LT) for female sterilization, even in general surgery departments. Results show comparable outcomes, making LS a recommended option.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Spontaneous ventricular rupture in adults].

Ugeskrift for laeger·1994
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Health
  • Surgical Procedures
  • Women's Health

Background:

  • Female sterilization is a common procedure for permanent contraception.
  • Surgical approaches include laparoscopy (LS) and laparotomy (LT).
  • Assessing the efficacy and safety of LS in non-specialized settings is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic sterilization (LS) versus laparotomy (LT) for female sterilization.
  • To evaluate the feasibility and safety of LS in a general surgery department.
  • To determine if results from a general surgery department are comparable to specialized gynecological departments.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 276 female sterilization procedures (LS or LT).
  • Data collected over a seven-year period in a general surgery department.
  • Analysis of conversion rates, post-sterilization patency, pregnancy rates, and complications.

Main Results:

  • The LS/LT ratio was 56%/44%.
  • Laparoscopic sterilization (LS) conversion to laparotomy (LT) occurred in 7.3% of cases.
  • Pregnancy rates were 3% after LS versus 1.8% after LT; metrorrhagia and infection rates were similar between groups.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic sterilization (LS) demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety to laparotomy (LT).
  • Outcomes in a general surgery department mirrored those in specialized gynecological departments.
  • Laparoscopic sterilization (LS) can be safely recommended for women in general surgery departments.

Related Experiment Videos