Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cancer prevention: setting the scene

J Austoker1

  • 1Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford.

BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
|May 28, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Preventing cancer is possible, with four-fifths of cases avoidable through available strategies. Public health initiatives and primary care interventions, like smoking cessation, are key to reducing cancer incidence and mortality in the UK.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication.

Endoscopy·2012
Same author

European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Communication.

Endoscopy·2012
Same author

Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer.

British journal of cancer·2009
Same author

Public awareness of cancer in Britain: a population-based survey of adults.

British journal of cancer·2009
Same author

Awareness of cancer symptoms and anticipated help seeking among ethnic minority groups in England.

British journal of cancer·2009
Same author

Interventions to promote cancer awareness and early presentation: systematic review.

British journal of cancer·2009
Same journal

Peptides: FDA appointed advisory committee criticised for conflicts of interest.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Hantavirus outbreak linked to cruise ship is over, say officials.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

BMA recommends that 16 and 17 year olds get access to cross sex hormones.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Andy Burnham could apply lessons from Manchester to create a healthier Britain with a stronger economy.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Uganda confirms Marburg case as Ebola outbreak continues.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Australia increases penalties for social media companies to enforce under 16s ban.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Oncology
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • Over 300,000 new cancer cases and 165,000 deaths occur annually in the UK.
  • A significant proportion of cancers (up to 80%) are believed to be preventable.
  • National and international programs aim to reduce cancer risk.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of population-wide and individual-focused cancer prevention strategies.
  • To emphasize the need for rigorous scientific testing of health promotion and screening interventions.
  • To guide resource allocation towards high-impact interventions in primary care.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing cancer prevention strategies and targets.
  • Discussion of population-based versus individual-based approaches.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasis on scientific validation of health promotion and screening programs.

    • Main Results:

    • Population-wide approaches are projected to yield the greatest reductions in cancer morbidity and mortality.
    • Primary care offers a platform for individual-based interventions targeting high-risk individuals.
    • Effectiveness of interventions must be scientifically proven, prioritizing high-benefit activities like smoking cessation.

    Conclusions:

    • Comprehensive cancer prevention requires both broad public health initiatives and targeted primary care interventions.
    • Scientific evidence is crucial for validating the efficacy of cancer prevention programs.
    • Focusing resources on interventions with the greatest potential benefit, such as smoking cessation, is essential for public health.