Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing healthcare outcomes

C Orchard1

  • 1National Casemix Office, Information Management Group of the NHS Executive, Winchester, Hampshire.

BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
|June 4, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing healthcare intervention quality is complex. Adjusting for patient factors is difficult due to prognosis uncertainty and data collection challenges, making crude statistics misleading.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fair selection of participants in clinical trials: The challenge to push the envelope further.

Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society·2019
Same author

Medical workforce planning. Spreading the load.

The Health service journal·1998
Same author

Measuring the effects of casemix on outcomes.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·1996
Same author

Management of clinical failure in Canadian nursing programs.

Western journal of nursing research·1994
Same author

The nurse educator and the nursing student: a review of the issue of clinical evaluation procedures.

The Journal of nursing education·1994
Same author

Mind your language.

The Health service journal·1993

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare quality assessment
  • Health services research

Background:

  • Governments aim to compare healthcare intervention quality and effectiveness.
  • Crude hospital statistics are often misleading for quality assessment.
  • Adjusting for patient case mix is necessary but challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the complexities in comparing healthcare interventions.
  • To identify challenges in adjusting for patient characteristics in quality comparisons.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of healthcare quality assessment challenges.
  • Methodological review of case-mix adjustment in healthcare.
  • Discussion of practical data collection and quantification issues.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identifying and weighting patient characteristics affecting prognosis is problematic.
  • Prognosis uncertainty poses conceptual and methodological hurdles.
  • Practical difficulties exist in collecting outcome data for interventions and risk factors.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate comparison of healthcare interventions requires sophisticated methods beyond crude statistics.
  • Addressing conceptual, methodological, and practical challenges is crucial for reliable healthcare quality assessment.