Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Jass' classification revisited

G T Deans1, M Heatley, N Anderson

  • 1Department of Surgery, Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
|July 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative transcriptome reprogramming in oak galls containing asexual or sexual generations of gall wasps.

Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)·2024
Same author

Age-period-cohort modelling of type 1 diabetes incidence rates among children included in the EURODIAB 25-year follow-up study.

Acta diabetologica·2022
Same author

Carbohydrate quantity is more closely associated with glycaemic control than weight in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: Insights from the Diabetes and Pre-eclampsia Intervention Trial (DAPIT).

Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association·2022
Same author

Clinical utility of ultrasonography-measured visceral adipose tissue depth as a tool in early pregnancy screening for gestational diabetes: a proof-of-concept study.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2019
Same author

Development of a Core Outcome Set for studies evaluating the effects of anaesthesia on perioperative morbidity and mortality following hip fracture surgery.

British journal of anaesthesia·2018
Same author

Corrigendum to 'Perioperative outcomes in the context of mode of anaesthesia for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis' [Br J Anaesth 2018; 120: 37-50].

British journal of anaesthesia·2018
Same journal

Breaking the Polytrauma-Brain Barrier: Using Point-of-Care Biomarkers in Severely Injured Trauma Patients.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Going the Extra Mile: Picking the Right Trauma Center Destination for Critically Injured Patients in a Mature State-Wide Trauma System.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

What Does It Mean for Surgeons to Be Flourishing?

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Tailor-Made Solution to Trimming Venous Thromboembolism Risk.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

NIH Funding in Surgical Artificial Intelligence: Who, What, Where, Why.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Efficacy and Safety of Rezūm Water Vapor Thermal Ablation in Large and Small Prostates: A Multicenter Comparative Analysis of 2,725 Patients.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
See all related articles

Dukes' classification for colorectal cancer prognosis is more reproducible and clinically valuable than Jass's system. Dukes' remains the preferred method for treatment decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Colorectal Cancer Research
  • Oncology Prognostics
  • Clinical Classification Systems

Background:

  • Jass and colleagues proposed an improved classification for colorectal cancer prognosis in 1986.
  • Clinical relevance of such classifications requires reproducibility and external validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the reproducibility and prognostic significance of Jass's classification against Dukes' classification.
  • To determine if Jass's system offers superior clinical utility for carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 312 cases of carcinoma of the colon and rectum.
  • Assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility for both classification systems using kappa values.
  • Multivariate regression analysis to identify key prognostic variables.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Dukes' classification demonstrated excellent reproducibility (kappa values 0.86–0.93).
  • Jass's classification variables showed poor agreement (kappa values 0.05–0.41).
  • Dukes' stage and patient age were primary prognostic indicators; tumor differentiation also significantly impacted survival.

Conclusions:

  • Dukes' classification offers superior prognostic value and reproducibility compared to Jass's components.
  • Continued use of Dukes' classification is recommended for prognostic and therapeutic decisions in colorectal cancer.