Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predicting orthostatic intolerance: physics or physiology?

D A Ludwig1, V A Convertino

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of North Carolina, Greensboro 27412-5001.

Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
|May 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Improving vital organs perfusion by the respiratory pump: physiology and clinical use].

Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation·2013
Same author

Monitoring non-invasive cardiac output and stroke volume during experimental human hypovolaemia and resuscitation.

British journal of anaesthesia·2010
Same author

Combat casualty care research at the U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research.

Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps·2010
Same author

Comparison of cardiac output monitoring methods for detecting central hypovolemia due to lower body negative pressure.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2007
Same author

A comparative bear model for immobility-induced osteopenia.

Ursus (International Association for Bear Research and Management)·2003
Same author

Renal responsiveness to aldosterone during exposure to head-down tilt bedrest.

Journal of gravitational physiology : a journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology·2003
Same journal

Goodbye to ASEM.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2014
Same journal

AsMA - a worldwide organization.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2014
Same journal

This month in aerospace medicine history.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2014
Same journal

You're the flight surgeon: hypogonadism.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2014
Same journal

You're the flight surgeon: fatigue.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2014
Same journal

Manned-unmanned teaming: expanding the envelope of UAS operational employment.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2014
See all related articles

Physical factors like height and plasma volume significantly predict orthostatic intolerance, a condition affecting blood pressure regulation. These physical traits appear more dominant than physiological reflexes in determining tolerance to lower body negative pressure (LBNP).

Area of Science:

  • Physiology
  • Cardiovascular Research
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Orthostatic intolerance (OI) assessment is complex, often limited to single factors due to time and instrumentation constraints.
  • Understanding the interplay of physical and physiological factors in OI is crucial for validating causal theories.
  • Previous research often studied isolated variables, hindering a comprehensive view of OI determinants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether physical factors or physiological reflexes are more dominant in contributing to orthostatic tolerance.
  • To simultaneously evaluate multiple physical and physiological parameters associated with OI in the same individuals.
  • To test the hypothesis that physical characteristics play a primary role in OI.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured six key variables in 14 males: height, plasma volume (as % body weight), R-R interval variation, leg compliance, carotid-cardiac baroreflex sensitivity, and cardiopulmonary baroreflex sensitivity.
  • Quantified orthostatic intolerance using time to syncope during progressive supine lower body decompression (LBNP).
  • Employed bootstrap resamplings (500-1,000) to assess the reproducibility of correlations and regression coefficients.

    • Main Results:

    • Individually, all six measured variables correlated with time to syncope.
    • When analyzed simultaneously, only height (negatively), plasma volume (positively), and carotid-cardiac baroreflex sensitivity showed consistent predictive value for time to syncope.
    • These findings suggest physical factors are more reproducible predictors of LBNP tolerance compared to physiological reflexes.

    Conclusions:

    • Physical factors, specifically height and plasma volume, appear to be dominant predictors of orthostatic tolerance during LBNP.
    • While physiological reflexes contribute to OI, their influence may be secondary or overwhelmed under significant orthostatic stress.
    • This study highlights the importance of considering physical attributes alongside physiological responses in OI research and clinical assessment.