Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is diversion just a diversion?

H Prins1

  • 1Midlands Centre for Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Loughborough, Leicestershire.

Medicine, Science, and the Law
|April 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Diversion for mentally disordered offenders is explored, challenging myths about incarceration. The paper suggests diversion is not novel but urges critical evaluation before widespread adoption.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A multi-centred randomised trial of radical surgery versus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after local excision for early rectal cancer.

BMC cancer·2016
Same author

Appropriateness of ICD-coded diagnostic inpatient hospital discharge data for medical practice assessment. A systematic review.

Methods of information in medicine·2012
Same author

Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma-A case study and review of the literature.

International journal of surgery case reports·2012
Same author

Evolution of mycotic aortic aneurysm treatment by endovascular repair.

Irish journal of medical science·2010
Same author

Long-term impact of physician encoding on detail and number of recorded diagnoses. Support by a speciality specific list of diseases.

Methods of information in medicine·2010
Same author

Zero tolerance of violence.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2005
Same journal

Characteristics of child physical abuse cases that are referred by the police for a clinical forensic medical examination.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Cost- and time-effectiveness of medico-legal management of healthcare-related infections: A bicentric comparative study.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

The right to die: A comparative analysis of end-of-life issues in Scandinavian legal systems.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Diagnosing autism in adult forensic settings.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Background asbestos fiber levels in autopsy lungs: Implications for forensic disease attribution in the post-ban era.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Changing patterns in volatile substance abuse fatalities: A retrospective case series from Northern Australia.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychology
  • Criminology
  • Mental Health Law

Background:

  • The treatment of mentally disordered individuals within the justice system is complex.
  • Incarceration practices for this population are often based on misconceptions.
  • Understanding the historical context of managing mentally disordered offenders is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the concept of diversion for mentally disordered offenders.
  • To critically analyze common beliefs surrounding the incarceration of mentally disordered individuals.
  • To assess the novelty and implications of diversionary strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of diversion programs and incarceration practices.
  • Analysis of historical and contemporary approaches to mentally disordered offenders.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conceptual analysis of diversion as a strategy.

    • Main Results:

    • Diversion for mentally disordered offenders is not a recent concept.
    • Myths surrounding the incarceration of mentally disordered individuals are prevalent.
    • The uncritical adoption of diversionary approaches carries potential risks.

    Conclusions:

    • Diversionary strategies for mentally disordered offenders require careful consideration.
    • A nuanced understanding of both diversion and incarceration is necessary.
    • Caution is advised when implementing diversion without critical appraisal.