Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Coronary artery perfusion

L L Michaelis1

  • 1Clinic of Surgery, National Heart and Lung Institute, Bethesda, Md. 20014.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
|July 1, 1975
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Coronary artery perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass offers theoretical myocardial protection but faces challenges. Its universal efficacy is questioned due to cannulation difficulties and risks of prolonged fibrillation, especially with partial perfusion.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contribution of the bronchial circulation to lung preservation.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·1991
Same author

Living-related lobar lung transplantation in beagle puppies.

Journal of pediatric surgery·1991
Same author

New uses of the laser in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

The Japanese journal of surgery·1990
Same author

Aggressive blood conservation in coronary artery surgery: impact on patient care.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·1990
Same author

Clinical experience with portable cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac arrest patients.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·1990
Same author

Input from many groups critical to good cancer care.

QA review : quality assurance news and views·1990
Same journal

Coronary artery bypass grafting based on computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve versus angiography: Early results.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Beyond R0: Margin Cytology and Local Control After Sublobar Resection.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Deferred AVR During CABG in Moderate Aortic Stenosis: Lower Index Risk or Deferred Cumulative Risk?

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

The Renaissance of Transapical TAVR: From Competing Access Route to Enabling Platform for Hybrid Heart Therapy.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

A Moving Target: Interpreting Post-TAVI Reintervention in a Rapidly Evolving Era.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

False Lumen Remodeling Versus Intraluminal Graft Thrombosis: Distinct Phenomena After Frozen Elephant Trunk Repair.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Cardiac Anesthesia
  • Myocardial Protection

Background:

  • Cardiopulmonary bypass is a standard procedure in cardiac surgery.
  • Myocardial protection is crucial during cardiac surgery to prevent ischemic damage.
  • Coronary artery perfusion is a technique aimed at improving myocardial protection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the theoretical benefits and practical limitations of coronary artery perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass.
  • To present arguments for and against the routine use of coronary artery perfusion.
  • To highlight the specific risks associated with partial coronary artery perfusion.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and clinical arguments regarding coronary artery perfusion.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of technical challenges in achieving adequate coronary artery perfusion.
  • Analysis of potential complications, including prolonged fibrillation.

    • Main Results:

    • Coronary artery perfusion theoretically provides optimal myocardial protection.
    • Practical challenges include difficulties with direct cannulation.
    • Prolonged fibrillation can occur despite perfusion, questioning its universal efficacy.

    Conclusions:

    • Coronary artery perfusion is not universally effective due to technical and physiological challenges.
    • The hazards of partial perfusion require careful consideration.
    • Further research may be needed to optimize techniques and indications for coronary artery perfusion.