Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Distortions and fluctuations in topographic memory

M D Giraudo1, J Pailhous

  • 1URA CNRS 1166, Université d'Aix-Marseille II, Faculté de Médecine, France.

Memory & Cognition
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Learning a space using a map versus navigation involves distinct cognitive processes. This study differentiated between spatial inaccuracy and response fluctuation in map-based and navigation-based learning tasks.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prior intention can locally tune inhibitory processes in the primary motor cortex: direct evidence from combined TMS-EEG.

The European journal of neuroscience·2009
Same author

Corticospinal control of the thumb-index grip depends on precision of force control: a transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imagery study in humans.

The European journal of neuroscience·2007
Same author

Stride variability in human gait: the effect of stride frequency and stride length.

Gait & posture·2003
Same author

Adaptation of neuromuscular synergies during intentional constraints of space-time relationships in human gait.

Journal of motor behavior·2000
Same author

Intentional on-line adaptation of stride length in human walking.

Experimental brain research·2000
Same author

Dynamic instability of visuospatial images.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2000

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Spatial Cognition
  • Human Navigation

Background:

  • Spatial learning is crucial for navigation and environmental understanding.
  • Previous research has explored map-based and navigation-based spatial learning, but the underlying cognitive processes remain debated.
  • Understanding response fluctuation versus genuine spatial inaccuracy is key to interpreting learning data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether learning spatial information through maps and through navigation engages equivalent cognitive processes.
  • To differentiate between response fluctuation and spatial inaccuracy in repeated spatial recall tasks.
  • To compare the cognitive demands of map-based versus navigation-based spatial learning.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted involving human subjects learning spatial layouts.
  • Experiment 1: Subjects repeatedly situated multiple locations on a blank map.
  • Experiment 2: Subjects learned and reproduced multiple maps, allowing for the analysis of distortion and response fluctuation over trials.

Main Results:

  • In Experiment 1, response inaccuracy and response fluctuation showed similar ranges.
  • In Experiment 2, response inaccuracy exhibited a greater range than response fluctuation.
  • The distinct patterns observed suggest differing cognitive mechanisms are at play.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial learning via map-based methods and navigation-based methods recruit different cognitive processes.
  • The study successfully distinguished between inherent spatial errors and variability in response execution.
  • Findings contribute to a deeper understanding of human spatial cognition and memory.

Related Experiment Videos