Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming

A Henik1, F J Friedrich, J Tzelgov

  • 1Department of Behavioral Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-sheva, Israel.

Memory & Cognition
|March 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Observing ageism implicitly using the numerical parity judgment task.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Right anterior cerebellum BOLD responses reflect age related changes in Simon task sequential effects.

Neuropsychologia·2017
Same author

Attentional bias in clinical depression and anxiety: The impact of emotional and non-emotional distracting information.

Biological psychology·2016
Same author

Lateralisation of emotions: evidence from pupil size measurement.

Cognition & emotion·2016
Same author

Using executive control training to suppress amygdala reactivity to aversive information.

NeuroImage·2015
Same author

Long trial durations normalise the interference effect and sequential updating during healthy aging.

Acta psychologica·2014

Semantic priming effects depend on task demands. Naming primes consistently yielded priming, while letter search tasks only showed priming when related items were frequent, suggesting resource allocation influences semantic processing.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • Semantic priming is a phenomenon where exposure to one stimulus influences the response to a subsequent stimulus.
  • The efficiency of semantic priming can be modulated by various experimental factors, including task demands and stimulus properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) and relatedness proportion (RP) affect semantic priming.
  • To compare priming effects when the prime stimulus is named versus when it is searched for a specific letter.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted manipulating SOA, RP, and prime task (naming vs. letter search).
  • Participants performed semantic priming tasks with varying prime-target intervals and proportions of related word pairs.
  • Response times and accuracy were measured to assess priming effects.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Naming the prime consistently resulted in semantic priming across different SOAs and RPs.
  • Priming effects in the letter search task were observed only when the proportion of related prime-target pairs was high (RP = .80).
  • Lower relatedness proportions (RP = .20) eliminated priming in the letter search task, regardless of SOA.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that task demands significantly influence the allocation of limited cognitive resources.
  • Semantic priming is more robust under conditions that facilitate automatic processing (naming) or when high relatedness guides attentional focus.
  • The results highlight the interplay between controlled and automatic processes in semantic memory retrieval.