Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Categorization response time with multidimensional stimuli

F G Ashby1, G Boynton, W W Lee

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara 93106.

Perception & Psychophysics
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Determining the Degree of Dopaminergic Denervation Based on the Loss of Nigral Hyperintensity on SMWI in Parkinsonism.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2021
Same author

<sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT for the evaluation of temporomandibular joint disorder.

Clinical radiology·2017
Same author

Validation of the Vectra H1 portable three-dimensional photogrammetry system for facial imaging.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2017
Same author

Maximum standardised uptake value of quantitative bone SPECT/CT in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee.

Clinical radiology·2017
Same author

Does serum uric acid act as a modulator of cerebrospinal fluid Alzheimer's disease biomarker related cognitive decline?

European journal of neurology·2016
Same author

Long-term control of diabetes in immunosuppressed nonhuman primates (NHP) by the transplantation of adult porcine islets.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2015
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Categorization response time (RT) is not influenced by stimulus familiarity or prototypes. Instead, faster reaction times occur as stimuli move further from the decision boundary.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Perception

Background:

  • Understanding categorization response time (RT) is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Previous research has explored factors influencing RT, including stimulus properties and familiarity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of stimulus familiarity and category prototypes in categorization RT.
  • To determine how physical dimensions of stimuli affect categorization RT.
  • To identify the primary factor influencing categorization RT.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using visual stimuli with varying physical dimensions.
  • Stimuli included line segments, rectangles, and circles/semicircles with radial arms.
  • Categorization response time was measured for each stimulus.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No significant evidence was found for the influence of stimulus familiarity on categorization RT.
  • Category prototypes did not play a special role in determining categorization RT.
  • Categorization RT decreased as the stimulus distance from the decision bound increased.

Conclusions:

  • Stimulus distance to the decision bound is a key determinant of categorization RT.
  • Familiarity and prototypes are not primary drivers of categorization RT in this context.
  • The findings suggest a geometric or spatial model for categorization decisions.