Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A framework to identify reactivity in qualitative research

B L Paterson1

  • 1School of Nursing, University of British Columbia.

Western Journal of Nursing Research
|June 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Reactivity, the interaction between researchers and participants, can affect qualitative research rigor. This review identifies reactivity sources and offers a framework for analyzing these effects reflexively.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nursing rounds as a pedagogical strategy: anchoring theory to practice in gerontological nursing.

Nurse education in practice·2008
Same author

"Are we in Kansas yet, Toto?" The construction of chronic illness in research.

The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres·2002
Same author

Refining your research question.

The Canadian nurse·2002
Same author

Nursing research.

The Canadian nurse·2002
Same author

Fruitful questioning.

The Canadian nurse·2002
Same author

Critical analysis of everyday self-care decision making in chronic illness.

Journal of advanced nursing·2001

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Rigor in qualitative research is crucial for reliable findings.
  • Reactivity, the mutual responses between researchers and participants, poses a challenge to research validity.
  • Understanding and managing reactivity is essential for robust qualitative inquiry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review common sources of reactivity in qualitative research.
  • To introduce a framework for analyzing reactivity in qualitative data.
  • To enhance researcher reflexivity in managing reactive effects.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of common reactivity sources in qualitative research.
  • Development of a conceptual framework for reactivity analysis.
  • Emphasis on reflexive practices for researchers.

Main Results:

  • Identified key sources of reactivity, including researcher presence and participant awareness.
  • Presented a structured framework to guide the analysis of reactive effects.
  • Highlighted the importance of researcher self-awareness and reflexivity.

Conclusions:

  • Reactivity is an inherent aspect of qualitative research that requires careful consideration.
  • The proposed framework offers a systematic approach to address and analyze reactivity.
  • Implementing reflexive practices can improve the rigor and trustworthiness of qualitative research findings.

Related Experiment Videos