Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative study of ankle support devices

R E Johnson1, J R Veale, G J McCarthy

  • 1College of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, University of Osteopathic Medicine and Health Sciences, Des Moines, IA 50312.

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
|March 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Eradication of endotracheal tube biofilm by nebulised gentamicin.

Intensive care medicine·2002
Same author

Accuracy of lesion bypass by yeast and human DNA polymerase eta.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2001
Same author

Gradual dose taper following chronic buprenorphine.

The American journal on addictions·2001
Same author

Ewald sum for electronic bilayer systems.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2001
Same author

Effects of a signature on rates of change: a randomized controlled trial involving continuing education and the commitment-to-change model.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
Same author

Incidence of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in the United States.

American journal of epidemiology·2001

This study evaluated four ankle braces for restricting inversion motion before and after exercise. Results indicate varying effectiveness and subjective user experiences with these common ankle support devices.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Sports Medicine
  • Orthopedics

Background:

  • Ankle sprains are common injuries, particularly in sports.
  • Ankle support devices are frequently used to prevent or manage ankle injuries.
  • Limited research compares the efficacy of different ankle braces under dynamic conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the ability of four popular ankle support devices to restrict active inversion range of motion.
  • To assess subjective user perceptions of stability, comfort, and ease of use for each device.
  • To evaluate device performance before and after exercise.

Main Methods:

  • Eighteen subjects participated in the study.
  • Maximum active inversion range of motion was measured using a specialized apparatus.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measurements were taken in three conditions: unbraced, braced before exercise, and braced after exercise.

    • Main Results:

    • The four ankle support devices demonstrated varying degrees of effectiveness in restricting inversion.
    • Subjective feedback indicated differences in perceived stability, comfort, and ease of application/removal among the devices.
    • Exercise influenced the ability of the devices to restrict inversion range of motion.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of ankle support device may impact its effectiveness in limiting inversion.
    • Subjective factors are crucial considerations for athletes when selecting an ankle brace.
    • Further research is needed to understand the long-term effects and optimal use of these devices.